Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This question won't be answered for a while. But the pundits will pontificate endlessly. Because that's what they do best...
1 posted on 09/25/2017 5:29:30 PM PDT by dayglored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Abby4116; afraidfortherepublic; aft_lizard; AF_Blue; amigatec; AppyPappy; arnoldc1; ATOMIC_PUNK; ...
Windows and Linux, more opinions ... PING!

You can find all the Windows Ping list threads with FR search: just search on keyword "windowspinglist".

2 posted on 09/25/2017 5:30:04 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

It will make it very convenient to get root.


3 posted on 09/25/2017 5:34:27 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

Cooperate. Coopt. Corrupt. Control.


4 posted on 09/25/2017 5:37:11 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored
So whom do you trust?

Richard Stallman                     or                     Mark Shuttleworth

5 posted on 09/25/2017 5:39:58 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored
Stallman is correct, the only software you should run is software you compiled yourself. MS Windows is a black box full of crap and any 'built-in" unix will be a bastardization.

Besides MS did this same exact thing in the 90's, then pulled the rug out. They have to pretend to include linux compatibility to get some mainly server software ported over but it will end up bastardized #ifdef MS_CRAP

13 posted on 09/25/2017 6:47:46 PM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

“Embrace, extend, extinguish” has long been Microsoft’s policy for killing competition.


16 posted on 09/25/2017 7:11:13 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

I ditched Microsoft and now use Linux Mint. Like a jilted lover, MS is now stalking me.


17 posted on 09/25/2017 8:00:29 PM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

Personally I think MS is focusing on cloud/Azure (which is where Nadella came from). Viewed from that perspective the embrace of Linux makes sense since they don’t care what OS you run in Azure as long as you run something and of course pay them.

I don’t think there is some nefarious embrace of death conspiracy afoot.


19 posted on 09/25/2017 9:22:35 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

Linux developers and the administrators of some of the most well liked distributions, at least, have maintained readiness all along for the kind of move that some are suspecting. The same goes for developers of the tens of thousands of free packages.

Linux is amazingly easy to download, install and get running now—even Debian. Very automatic compared to the way it was during the ‘90s and very quick to get running.

And Linux provides all that I need, although I prefer NetBSD because of its extra stability, security and usefulness with more platforms (quite a bit of manual user configuration required). For security in running *BSD, though, most end-users might prefer OpenBSD for its ease of installation with even more security as a default instead of needing to add it manually.


20 posted on 09/25/2017 10:30:04 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

Besides, remember the SCO-Linux disputes? MS was said to have thrown quite a bit of support to SCO. See which side won?


21 posted on 09/25/2017 10:37:53 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

It should be emphasized that Stallman did not say that he expects Linux to be extinguished. The article quoted his explanation.


22 posted on 09/25/2017 10:49:59 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

History since 1980 gives Stallman 90% probability of being correct about MS planning destruction of Linux.

That’s my 2 cents, LOL.

(Actually, I think it is an absolute certainty.)


23 posted on 09/25/2017 11:06:31 PM PDT by RebelTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson