To: the OlLine Rebel
If you’re going to get that granular with definitions then technically the Cuda and Mustang don’t qualify as muscle cars either... they would be considered pony cars.
I know that vettes were marketed as “sports cars” but they have always been included as part of the American muscle car iconography.
207 posted on
09/13/2017 8:33:21 AM PDT by
bar sin·is·ter
(Climate Scientology - another example of science fiction morphing into a religious cult)
To: bar sin·is·ter
I know that Vettes were marketed as sports cars but they have always been included as part of the American muscle car iconography. Agree. Can't think of them not being categorized as a muscle car, with a factory installed 327 or 427.
213 posted on
09/13/2017 9:15:00 AM PDT by
ETL
(See my FR Home page for a closer look at today's Communist/Anarchist protest groups)
To: bar sin·is·ter
4-speed, 427

214 posted on
09/13/2017 9:18:38 AM PDT by
ETL
(See my FR Home page for a closer look at today's Communist/Anarchist protest groups)
To: bar sin·is·ter
No. They are in a different class. Corvettes existed before “muscle car” became a fad with the car companies which started with GTO Tempest.
Most of us AACA-type car nuts don’t consider it “muscle” in the collectible sense. It’s a race car more along the lines of Porsches and Ferraris, albeit “lower grade” perhaps.
230 posted on
09/13/2017 10:09:40 AM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson