Just a theory, but that absolutely would make sense.
They would NEVER tell us.
Theories are not news.
The part that gives me pause, though, is the USN deaths:
If the collisions had been part of a raw-material related RAMMING, well then you’d expect that everyone would be braced, in a different part of the ship, etc.
And then, why not simply perform a BOARDING..?
By chopper, or, more stealthily, by RIB.
I covered this on another thread.
Bogus story being floated by Al Reuters.
Even far more bogus than NK using ICBM to create EMP pulse.
TURD
He does put forth some compelling arguments. I’ve been watching many of FM’s videos since the Fitzgerald incident. I have no doubt in my mind that those ships were deliberately rammed.
Uh, guys? Why would you scan a thousand foot long ship by passing in front of it? Would it not make far more sense to pass along side of the target ship to be scanned and only need to scan across the width of the ship as you steal along side instead of trying to scan the distance through the length of the ship as you dart across the oncoming bow?
Just a common sense observation that shoots your theory, er, out of the water, so-to-speak.
Bfl
More clickbait from a master baiter
This is a plausible explanation of why our Navy ships are getting so close.