Jesse Watters on Imran Awan: What's a Top Clinton Attorney Doing Defending Low-Level IT Staffer?

FNC ^ | Aug 7, 2017

[Ray76]

Fox News' Jesse Watters brought up a great question while discussing Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s criminal IT staffer Imran Awan on ‘The Five’. What on earth is a top Clinton attorney doing defending a low-level IT staffer? Excellent question!

[where's_the_Outrage?]

For the little people being oppressed by the Trump administration using the resources of the US GVT against those that supported Hillary.

[Fedora]

Because he’s not just defending a low-level IT staffer: he’s defending the Clintons’ crime machine.

[neverevergiveup]

From objective observation, it is clear that a large percentage of the left doesn’t care if Hillary or any of their other ‘heroes and heroines commit criminal acts. They just don’t want them to get caught. If they can get away with it, it’s all great.

[Major Matt Mason]

It's a good way to keep track of Imran in case he decides to have an accident (nudge, nudge, wink, wink).

[GOPJ]

ping

[TBP]

He’s a spy.

[FreeReign]

I’m pretty sure Watters asked the question rhetorically and knew the correct answer. But yes it’s always good to say it.

[bigbob]

Now THAT is a damned good question!

[Ann Archy]

What’s the attorneys NAME???

[jjotto]

Chris Gowen.

Worked for Bill and Hillary and the Clinton Foundation.

[WHBates]

Would you know his hourly rate or his he working pro-bono?

[jjotto]

Top law firms like Gowen’s get over $1000 per hour. Some high profile lawyers do things for publicity, but Gowen seems like a work horse not a show horse and wouldn’t likely work for free.

No telling who will pay him, but Mayo Hair DWS is already up to her neck in this so risks nothing more by being the conduit for Awans’ attorney fees.

[Robert357]

Why? Because he has high level information that could put prominent Democrats in orange jumpsuits.

[joshua c]

The Dem lawyer is there to make sure the canary does not sing.

[Liz]

Clinton go-fer Chris Gowen’s bizarre statement after Imran's arrest reads like agit-prop from a campaign operative, rather than a criminal attorney. Could be that Awan is rolling on Wasserman Schultz, so the Clintons are hanging her out to dry to insulate themselves from whatever blowback the DNC e-mails might generate for them.

===========================================

Should the press decide it’s time to man-up and do some actual journo work, they might ask:

1. Who coordinated the hiring of the Awan clan by dozens of Democratic Congressman?

2. Why were they so grossly overcompensated w/ millions of tax dollar for little or no work?

3. Were kick-backs to the Democrats included? For doing “dirty work." Or was the clan blackmailing them?

4. Why did D/W/S threaten the Capitol Police about the laptop confiscated from Imran Awan?

5. Why did D/W/S keep Imran on her payroll after the Capitol Police barred the Paki clan from accessing Congressional computers?

6. Why did Iraqi fugitive and Hizb'allah supporter, Dr. Ali-al Attar, “lend” the Awan's $100,000?

7. Who is paying Chris Gowen, a bigtime Clinton insider, to represent Imran Awan?

8. Why did the Awan clan have security clearances after several bankruptcies and financial misdealings? (Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

=========================================

Democrat Cong Schultz's vileness, duplicity, and evilness, is breathtaking.

Self-serving Schultz knowingly helped endanger Americans then brazenly
slashes and burns the Trump admin.

[Ann Archy]

Well, he’s OBVIOUSLY DIRTY!! Did the Clintons put the Awan Brothers into the Democrat Caucus?

[Ray76]

The attorney is Chris Gowen

[Ray76]

Gowen background

https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/arrested-dem-it-staffers-attorney-is-major-clinton-ally

[GOPJ]

1. Who coordinated the hiring of the Awan clan by dozens of Democratic Congressman?

2. Why were they so grossly overcompensated w/ millions of tax dollar for little or no work?

3. Were kick-backs to the Democrats included?

Kick backs or 'favors in kind'...

We can forget the New York Times covering this - the Jeremy Peters types are blind to anything that might hurt a democrat. Same with David Ignatius and Bob Woodward. Journalists are such disappointments... Maybe FOX?