Guilty!
Posted on 08/02/2017 11:31:55 AM PDT by nickcarraway
Cleaner jailed after blackmailing pensioner out of £10,000 by threatening to say he'd sexually assaulted her Linda Thomas was only caught because bank staff queried why her vulnerable victim was withdrawing huge sums
A manipulative cleaner who blackmailed a “vulnerable” pensioner into paying her £10,000 to stop her making false allegations of sexual assault against him has been jailed.
Linda Thomas’ actions were only revealed when diligent bank staff quizzed her elderly victim after she demanded a further payment of £10,000.
Thomas, 62, got the man in his 80s to hand over £10,000 but was caught after she demanded the same amount again not to report the false allegation and bank staff, suspicious about such large withdrawals, raised the alarm with the police.
Thomas, of Briscwm Cottages, Cardigan, was found guilty of blackmailing the pensioner, who cannot be named for legal reasons, in October 2015 after a trial at Swansea Crown Court in June.
On Monday Judge Geraint Walters said the offence happened after the man kissed Thomas as they parted company – something the man told the court happened frequently between them as a greeting.
“Once he had done that you told him that you were going to make an allegation that he had sexually touched you if he were not to pay you the sum of £10,000,” said Judge Walters.
“(A few days later) you telephoned him and told him that you wanted that £10,000 or you were going to tell the police that he had touched you on the breast, something which he had in fact never done.
“That day, following the conversation, your victim went to the bank and withdrew £8,000 in cash.
“You went to his home later that day and collected the £8,000, telling him that the money was £2,000 short.”
The court heard the man returned to his bank two days later and Thomas collected the further sum three days after that.
Judge Walters said: “When you did so you told him that you needed another £10,000 and promised him that if he were to pay that that would be your last demand of him.
“He went to the bank again, this time seeking to withdraw another £10,000.”
The court heard staff at the bank had been suspicious when the man withdrew the first two sums but he had told them he planned to give the cash to family members.
On his third visit staff took him into a room and quizzed him again, getting him to reveal Thomas’ blackmail.
Judge Walters said the “elderly, vulnerable gentleman” had “no desire” to involve the police but was persuaded to stay in the bank while they were contacted and arrived.
He said Thomas “grossly abused” the man’s confidence in her and played on the fact she knew he would be acutely embarrassed “about being labelled a sexual predator”.
“But for the care that the staff of the bank ... showed you would have got away with receiving £20,000 and what you had done would have forever remained a secret,” he added.
Have-a-go hero tried to tackle knife-wielding gang who stole £17,000 from post office The court heard Thomas had a previous conviction for shoplifting in 1993 and for three offences of benefit fraud in 2010.
Dyfed Thomas, for the prosecution, read a victim statement supplied by a member of the man’s family, who said the incident had made a “huge difference to him”.
Mr Thomas said the man had gone from being active to “withdrawn and something of a recluse”.
Dean Pulling, for the defence, said there was “no great level of sophistication or high level of planning involved” in the offence and that Thomas lived an “uncomplicated” life with her cat and her dog.
He said she suffered from anxiety, depression and various other health concerns.
“Both her mother and her sister have taken their own lives and she has struggled with that loss, as is clear from the letter from her GP,” he said.
Mr Pulling added that Thomas, who wept in the dock as he spoke on her behalf, was assessed as a low risk of reoffending.
Judge Walters said Thomas, who maintained her innocence despite the verdict of the jury, had not shown any remorse or desire to repay the money.
She was sentenced to 18 months in prison.
Guilty!
I'd pay a few thousand quid NOT to kiss the old hag.
She showed “no desire to repay” the money she had extorted from her victim.
Huh.
Really? Wouldn’t she be *required* to repay it?
My question too. Why in the world do the British courts exert themselves so much in favor of the perpetrators? Not that we’re far behind, of course.
Bust her head with a cricket bat.
Too late from the looks of her.
I meant as an improvement.
Did she repay the money or not?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.