Why would anyone pay to see a movie about Gary Hart?
It might depends on who plays Donna Rice.
There are so many poli-sci majors, they’re going to bundle it into the “materials” charge. The “school” makes money, the film makes money...
I don't know, maybe democrats who are growing disillusioned with the democrat party for being such losers would want to look back on a simpler time, when it was their parent's generation of democrats who were losers?
Why would Hugh Jackman want this role? He's an A-lister, and this doesn't seem like an A list kind of role. Maybe he wants to re work his image to be more non-superhero-ish. At least he doesn't have to work out all the time for this movie.
I'd rather see a movie of Hugh Jackman playing Hugh Jackman. I recently watched him in "Logan." Sad to think he'll never be playing Wolverine again.
“Why would anyone pay to see a movie about Gary Hart?”
Are you nuts? This is a $500 million blockbuster for sure! That’s before world rights and action figures.
How about one about my favorite ex-presidential candidate John Edwards? The plot would have extramarital sex, out of wedlock children, a cover up, cozy deal with UNC to run some kind of anti-poverty institute there...and get paid for it. Feuds with the neighbors about his compound near Chapel Hill. Shyster lawyerly doings. Too much drama to list!
“Why would anyone pay to see a movie about Gary Hart?”
My very first thought, beat me to it.