Schrödinger's cat: a cat, a flask of poison, and a radioactive source are placed in a sealed box. If an internal monitor detects radioactivity (i.e. a single atom decaying), the flask is shattered, releasing the poison that kills the cat. The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics implies that after a while, the cat is simultaneously alive and dead. Yet, when one looks in the box, one sees the cat either alive or dead, not both alive and dead. This poses the question of when exactly quantum superposition ends and reality collapses into one possibility or the other. Credit: Wikipedia / CC BY-SA 3.0
1 posted on
05/08/2017 5:55:50 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Schroedinger cat states? It’s a state; it’s not a state... Kurdistan! (Palestine! Donbas! South Ossetia! Pretty much anywhere the UN has ever been!)
2 posted on
05/08/2017 5:58:15 AM PDT by
dangus
To: BenLurkin
4 posted on
05/08/2017 6:02:32 AM PDT by
Buttons12
To: BenLurkin
I only read this page to see what clever illustrations the Freepers come up with.
5 posted on
05/08/2017 6:03:34 AM PDT by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
To: BenLurkin
There is no cat. It’s a thought experiment. The conclusions of the so-called scientists are contrary to logic. A creature is either alive or dead. There is no middle state between the two.
1 is either equal to 0 or not. There is no middle state between the two.
6 posted on
05/08/2017 6:08:04 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(Liberalism is the denial of human nature.)
To: BenLurkin; wbarmy
8 posted on
05/08/2017 6:15:36 AM PDT by
KC_Lion
(Proud Keeper of the Sarah Palin and New First Lady Melania Ping Lists. Let me know if you want on.)
To: BenLurkin
Would that no be Schrodinger’s Kittens?....................
9 posted on
05/08/2017 6:15:59 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Profanity is the sound of an ignorant mind trying to express itself.............)
To: BenLurkin
To capture said CAT, which is moving at the speed-of-light in a 2-dimensional box (LxH), the highest probability of capture within that 2-dimensional box exists at either end of that box wherein the CAT must ^stop^ and change direction.
At either end of the box, the result of the integral-equation is equal to ‘1’ (or, so Dr. Vu taught us in Quantum Mechanics and Dr. Freeman taught us in “Diff-EQ”)
11 posted on
05/08/2017 6:17:25 AM PDT by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
To: BenLurkin
16 posted on
05/08/2017 6:48:54 AM PDT by
KSCITYBOY
(The media is corrupt)
To: BenLurkin
“This leads to an entangled state in the two output channels of that beam splitter. In one of these channels, a special detector is placed. In the event this detector shows a certain result, a “cat” is born in the second output whose energy is more than twice that of the initial one.”
The Lvovsky group tested this method in the lab. In the experiment, they successfully converted a pair of negative squeezed “Schrodinger cats” of amplitude 1.15 to a single positive “cat” of amplitude 1.85. They generated several thousand such enlarged “cats” in their experiment. “
Two 1.15 cats in, one 1.85 cat out. 2.30-1.85= .45 in loss.
17 posted on
05/08/2017 6:51:42 AM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: BenLurkin
When they can put a dead cat in the box, and have a live cat come out of the box, then I’ll be impressed.
18 posted on
05/08/2017 6:52:31 AM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: BenLurkin
22 posted on
05/08/2017 8:56:51 AM PDT by
Duke C.
To: BenLurkin
23 posted on
05/08/2017 10:10:04 AM PDT by
mikrofon
(Cinco de Quantum BUMP)
To: BenLurkin
‘In essence, we cause interference of two “cats” on a beam splitter. This leads to an entangled state...’
Yarn?
26 posted on
05/08/2017 11:17:49 AM PDT by
dangus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson