Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are consumer PCs safe from the Intel ME/AMT exploit? (Intel says don't worry?)
semiaccurate.com ^ | May 3, 2017 | by Charlie Demerjian

Posted on 05/04/2017 7:16:27 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Analysis: Here are SemiAccurate’s thoughts

Intel - logoTLDR; There is a remote control mechanism in hardware that cannot be fully disabled and you cannot get Intel hardware without it.  So while this patch may fix the current vulnerability this situation points to the urgent need for hardware diversity.

Monday SemiAccurate brought you news of a critical remote exploit in all 2008+ Intel CPU’s. Today we will walk you through a chain of thought based on further investigation on how it could be exploited.

Confidence Levels:

While this is only analysis we will note that we believe this is in the wild right now. We would like to make very clear that none of the information here has been publicly proven. However, follow us on an excursion and let us know if you come to a different conclusion. Or if you have other enlightening information, please send it our way.

Hardware and Fuses:

First off all non-server, including workstation but possibly not Atom based, systems contain the hardware needed for this exploit. Over the past several years during conversations with Intel personnel, the hardware is said to be ‘not there’ on machines that don’t have the correct chipset, usually -Q coded variants. Unofficial conversations have led SemiAccurate to believe that the hardware necessary for the AMT exploit is both there and functional. For the short and mid-term past, there is only one chipset die across all ‘small’ (non-E/EP/EX) CPU platforms.

Intel claims the ME is ‘fused off’ completely. SemiAccurate does not believe this to be totally accurate.  Our research indicates that there were fuses blown but they don’t actually disable the hardware. If Intel’s claims are accurate then why are bits of functionality that should be “hard disabled” present in other consumer grade features?

(Excerpt) Read more at semiaccurate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: hitech; linux; malware; security; windows

1 posted on 05/04/2017 7:16:27 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Lucky for me I use AMDs.


2 posted on 05/04/2017 8:01:03 PM PDT by Seruzawa (I kill you filthy Vorga.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
I do also and run Linux ...but I find this very interesting but I am not aware of this kind of a feature on the FX chips.

But you would like need it to make sales to corps supporting a large number of PCs in the hands of remote staff.

3 posted on 05/04/2017 9:25:24 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson