Click The Pic
Posted on 05/04/2017 11:40:28 AM PDT by Morgana
Ah, another heartwarming story from my home state. #HoosierPride
Anthony Gockowski, Campus Reform:
A pro-choice professor accused pro-life organizations of “child pornography” for using images of dead fetuses as a rhetorical device during a debate at Purdue University.
At an April 24 debate hosted by the Boilermakers for Life student organization, David Sanders, an associate professor of Biology at Purdue, accused his interlocutor of “child pornography” for showing “images of fetuses” when defending his pro-life views.
Because they’re naked, you see. He’s really thought this through.
Well, except for one thing. The esteemed professor accidentally made a huge concession to his opponents there. Did he say “fetus pornography”? Did he say “clump-of-cells pornography”? No. He said “child pornography.” An abortion enthusiast just conceded the argument. It’s not a choice, it’s a child.
Way to go, Professor Sanders. The good news is that you just ran the ball 99 yards for a touchdown. The bad news is that it was for the other team.
Finally they said it.
Yes, that’s progress... I think.
These people are truly mad.
That means abortion is murder.
Words have meanings.
Very amusing to see how Nazis, Communists, Leftist and now abortionists must contort language and twist logic to justify their barbarism.
So does that mean a man having sex with a pregnant woman can be charged with sexual molestation of a minor?
It is a question that has to be asked.
Naw to the libs this would be just another “pizza party”
“Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy?
The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them.
Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that?
Have you forgotten doublethink?”—George Orwell, 1984
An abortion is child pornography.
Life begins at the moment of conception.
Fetal Images Are ‘Child Pornography’
Projection?
You and I see the contradiction. But this is a liberal. Liberals can hold two contradictory thoughts in their minds at the same time.
This is a child and you’re going to jail because you’re a Christian.
This is a clump of cells and the woman has the right to slice it off, discard it, and offer it for sale.
That makes an abortionist a pedophile.
If the perfesser thinks that is child pornography then the perfesser is a perv.
Does he realize he has just completely and utterly destroyed his own position?
Of course he doesn’t.
Further ultrasounds of a person in utero taken for medical imaging are not child porn.
Idiot Sanders, if a picture of a clump of cells is CHILD PORN, wouldn’t the same clump of cells a CHILD? This teen is confused...(not really, libs are morons). :-)
Prof obviously has a screw loose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.