Posted on 03/05/2017 10:29:41 AM PST by Jeff Chandler
Washington Post
Sketchy. Really hard to find.
Except that Mark Levin held up paper-copy proof this morning.
And it’s all public record.
The WashingFake Post is trying their hand at fiction writing.
Just like all the “Russians did it” stories.
“claims relies on sketchy, anonymously sourced reports” no one knows this
Explain this to me like I received 12 years of government run education. How is this headline different from the way they usually write them?
The words of the President of the United States, straight from his own fingertips, are an "anonymous source?"
BTW and OT, but where the heck are Meryl Streep, Rosie O'Donnell, and Michael Moore? They seem to have dropped right off the face of the Earth.
Not that I mind.
Would not AG Sessions be able to tell almost immediately if this took place?
Their own sketchy, anonymously sourced reports they should add.
irony
noun iro·ny \ˈī-rə-nē also ˈī(-ə)r-nē\
1: a pretense of ignorance and of willingness to learn from another assumed in order to make the other's false conceptions conspicuous by adroit questioning —called also Socratic irony
2: the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaningb : a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by ironyc : an ironic expression or utterance
3
(1) : incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result
(2) : an event or result marked by such incongruity : incongruity between a situation developed in a drama and the accompanying words or actions that is understood by the audience but not by the characters in the play —called also dramatic irony, tragic irony
______________________________________________________________
If the WaPost, specialist in aketchy, anonymously sourced innuendo for political purposes, was trying to demonstrate irony, they did a great job. This is the most tragic instance of irony I've seen in journalism.
Funny how it went from “no evidence” to “sketchy evidence” in one day. Tune in tomorrow.
Washington Pravda at it again reporting with headlines full
of adjectives and few nouns. The mark of a true propaganda machine.
Yeah, Trump’s such a master negotiator that he doubles down and bets his presidency on something he read in the Daily Mail. Right.
Perhaps, if the DOJ still had some of Obama admin's computers and file cabinets in the building.
By now you would think that the Washington Post would be able to connect the dots between what Trump says and reality. Trump has a long record of being correct!
sort of like their ‘evidence’ of Russian hacking?
Well, have they mentioned the “sketchy” evidence of the Russian “interference” in the election in their headlines?
Isn’t that exactly the same kind of sources that the WP uses all the time when reporting about Trump or anything else?
No Russian hacking is a fact according to Fake CNNews
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
