Women’s studies professors divided over whether women’s studies is too vagina-centric

College Fix ^ | January 31, 2017 | Jennifer Kabany

[C19fan]

Women’s studies professors are now divided over whether women’s studies is too vagina-centric.

The controversy centers on a planned panel called “Pregnancy Without Women” slated for an upcoming National Women’s Studies Association conference.

[LostPassword]

At least one of them is going about this all wrong. The first “Women-without-vaginas Studies” professor will get lots of publicity, praise, and grants and have his/her/its/their choice of colleges.

[FlingWingFlyer]

“Vagina-centric”! LOL! I’ve got a new term. Thanks “perfeser”!

[I want the USA back]

It’s insanity-centered. Completely contrary to human nature.

[EQAndyBuzz]

“IOW how do you include men who pretend they are women into the paradigm?”

They have a womyn’s studies program that is anti man, then women are blaming us because we don’t know what women are going through.

That’s like having a black studies program that excludes whites then whites are blamed because they don’t understand what blacks go through.

That’s like having an LBGT studies.....

And on and on and on.

[BlueLancer]

"I’m tired of seeing all these threads from liberal sites on this conservative forum. If I wanted stupid I would comment on those sites myself and not bother the conservatives here with the drivel."

Aww, come on now ... you've been here long enough to recognize the value of having articles posted here that we can all have a good laugh at, watching the feminists and the trannies having a good old hair-pulling cat-fight, trying to twist their logic to allow everyone to fit into one deformed and depraved basket. Some of us get tired of articles that we actually have to reflect upon; these we can just laugh at and point to when confronting people we know or work with who advocate these types of things.

I can remember the days when threads would run forever with no social impact except for "Mooses" and "cheese" and moose-bitten sisters ... there's plenty of room for humor here on FR.

Definitely an anti-social type ...

[Bratch]

The majority of my adolescence was spent studying vaginas.

Where’s my diploma?

[Nevadan]

Re: If you said and honestly believed something like this 20 years ago, they would have locked you up. Now they make you a Wymyns Stydies professor.

I don't think we have to go that far back. Maybe just 5 years or even less. I am hearing crazy new stuff just this year that these lunatics are attempting to mainstream into American thought. There does appear to be an escalation of lunacy from the wacko feminists in academia.

[Mr Ramsbotham]

Considering that many women now have penises, that’s not an unreasonable assessment.

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

Reminds me of an old joke which I won’t repeat here..

” Man, you looks bad!”

“But I feels good!”

No more for now.

[Uncle Miltie]

Women’s Studies: Tranny Phobic!

[UCANSEE2]

The first “Women-without-vaginas Studies” professor will get lots of publicity, praise, and grants and have his/her/its/their choice of colleges.

[MIchaelTArchangel]

Women’s Studies is a program for people too stupid to get into medical school to “study” gynecology.

[dhs12345]

These nutty women whine about being objectified based on their body parts and then they themselves identify themselves by their body parts.

Apparently two wrongs make a right.

[AppyPappy]

No no no. Only women know what women have gone through but men can be women. Men can get pregnant now. Women can have penises now.

They have to de-female-ize the feminist movement because not all women are females.

I think...

[Spruce]

Can you imagine saving to pay for your kid to go to college and they tell you they’re going to major in women’s studies?

I’d say “Heck yeah! New Corvette! Good luck paying for your barista school, dumba**!” And then proceed to the chevy dealer and cigar store

[stylin19a]

thread is useless without pictures....

[lafroste]

Oh, it’s not too bad. I remember a time in my life when I was somewhat vagina centric too. :)

[Pearls Before Swine]

Cultural Marxist version of Trotskyites v. Stalinists. Popcorn!

Less vagina, more breast!

(Said in the spirit of "Tastes great, less filling" from the Miller beer ad).

[tbw2]

This is the result of the liberal victimhood hierarchy. The more exotic the group, the more moral it is seen.
Thus homosexuals and transgenders trump women in the victimhood hierarchy.
The transgender is more important than women when it comes to privacy considerations in the bathroom and it gets to dominate “women’s events” because everyone else is told to defer to it.
TERF or trans-exclusionary radical feminists have been bashed for years for saying a man in a dress shouldn’t be at women’s only events, or in the case of Camille Pagalia, shouldn’t he have to be a woman for at least a year before getting an award?
So this has been building for a while, but the insanity of the few females who say they are males getting pregnant each year puts them at the top of the moral hierarchy. Therefore, they demand saying “pregnant people” instead of admitting a woman with a uterus and identifying as a man is a mentally ill woman.

[thulldud]

If I wanted stupid I would comment on those sites myself and not bother the conservatives here with the drivel.

You know how libs attack, especially fem-libs? It always begins with some variant of "point and shriek".

With us, it's "point and die laughing". We know there's no substance there. But let the hilarity ensue, it's at least good for a laugh, and a merry heart doeth more good than many years of Obamacare.