Posted on 01/15/2017 7:35:51 AM PST by cba123
Peter Thiel, the Silicon Valley billionaire and outspoken Donald Trump supporter, is considering a 2018 bid for California governor, according to three Republicans familiar with his thinking.
Thiel, who co-founded PayPal and was an early investor in Facebook, has been discussing a prospective bid with a small circle of advisers, including Rob Morrow, who has emerged as his political consigliere.
(please see link for full article)
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Thiel is not climbing down from this story.
He strongly supported Trump. And he is worth nearly as much.
Pro-independence for CA.
May run for CA governor next time around.
Haha I saw someone added “searchworks” to the keywords.
I did a search after I posted this, sorry.
But it’s a good article. Mods it is up to you, it seems like this was already posted yesterday, but I think it is maybe worth posting again.
Up to you. :D
Mr. Thiel is second only to Pres. Trump in courage. He knows how the howling packs of hate-mongers will attack him.
I read the interview and I think that he was talking tongue-in-cheek when he talked abouT California secession.
Not that he could ever not be successful, but 2018 might be too soon. The anti-Trump sentiment in the major population areas of the State is massive and is mindlessly not open to reason. Maybe later after Trump has unquestionably proven himself by the success of his policies.
Peter Thiel also thinks that injecting yourself with “young blood” will help restore your youth and maybe be a key to immortality.
Only problem: where do they get all that “young blood”?
Does anyone else have a problem with rich elitists seeking immortality...?
A waste of time and money! If he does decade to run for California Governor, then he will lose and lose badly, in a “lost cause for conservatism” state.
It sounds like Mr. Thiel could support Trump in not only peacefully forcing the feds to surrender state powers that the feds have stolen from the states back to the states, but also in putting a stop to unconstitutional federal taxes, taxes that Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers and other express constitutional expenses.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
Once patriots support Trump, Thiel and other proven leaders in putting a stop to unconstitutional federal taxes, then the states will probably find a tsunami of new revenues that they probably wont know what to do with, establishing their own healthcare and social security programs for starters.
"The States should be left to do whatever acts they can do as well as the General Government." --Thomas Jefferson to John Harvie, 1790.
And if the states should eventually decide that the feds have some kind of a magic wand to run social spending programs better then the states can (yeah, right), then the states can always amend the Constitution to grant the feds the specific powers to do so.
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Remember in November 18 !
Since Trump entered the 16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the 18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist justices off of the bench.
Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February 18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitutions Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal governments powers.
Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal governments limited powers listed below.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphasis added]. Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
If he supports Trump he has absolutely zero chance of winning the governorship of California.
Only problem: where do they get all that young blood?
Does anyone else have a problem with rich elitists seeking immortality...?
Easy, just extract the blood from the Soylent Green ingredients...:^)
Good luck to him however Ca is 60% dummycrats.
...”Mr. Thiel is second only to Pres. Trump in courage. He knows how the howling packs of hate-mongers will attack him.”...
I surely hope he runs. I think he definitely could win because many Californians have to feel that they have lost their state. Perhaps a new face of courage could change things. And, like Trump, he doesn’t have to make corrupt alliances to run because he can finance his own campaign.
Thiel would have my vote if he ran - he’s as close to my ideal for a candidate as California is likely to come any time soon. But for that reason, he’s not likely to win. California’s voting populace has become overwhelmingly leftist, thanks to uncontrolled illegal immigration and the fact that Hispanics overwhelmingly vote Democrat.
I can imagine that the situation could get so bad in
California that a majority of the residents may come
to their senses and elect a conservative Republican.
But who knows. They may be so devoted to their Leftist
ideology that they can't see or accept reality.
Good luck to him however Ca is 60% dummycrats.
___________________________________
Actually, CA has elected more GOP governors the last 25 years than Dem. If Thiel pushes a business/jobs heavy platform, then he has a real chance.
Not even that; if he puts an “R” after his name, he’s history. California is gone.
Dear Gd, some form of HOPE for this state????!?
Is there no end to this winning?????
Not with a democrat controlled state assembly it’s ran like Chicago’s Cook county.
“a small circle of advisers, including Rob Morrow”
I hope it’s not the actor, Rob Morrow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.