Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What sank the Titanic? New documentary claims fire weakened hull
abc7chicago.com ^ | Thursday, January 05, 2017 12:41PM | Staff

Posted on 01/05/2017 1:48:18 PM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Red Badger

No matter what other things may have been wrong with the ship. Hitting the iceberg is the cause of sinking. If it doesn’t hit the ice it doesn’t sink. End of story.


21 posted on 01/05/2017 2:27:21 PM PST by Clean_Sweep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Geeezz! And All This Time I Thought It Hit An Iceberg!
Foolish Me!
22 posted on 01/05/2017 2:27:24 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbrown7.62x39

Over half the dead in the Wilhelm Gustloff sinking were children. The ship was on an evacuation mission.

There are leftists in Germany today who argue that the torpedoing of the Gustloff was a legitimate act of war.


23 posted on 01/05/2017 2:27:43 PM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I just spent 2 weeks on a cruise ship the Titanic sank because it did not have stabilizers its as simple as that. today when they yell Colombian coffee is now being served on the port side they compensate for the rush of people


24 posted on 01/05/2017 2:29:37 PM PST by al baby (Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

That is still hilarious who said that first ? Don Rickles ?


25 posted on 01/05/2017 2:32:02 PM PST by al baby (Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

While that may be, one should also consider the fact that the kriegsmarine repainted it from hospital ship colors to regular navy gray. S-13 saw the AA guns and figured her for a warship. What was the sub skipper supposed to think? I realize your average Russian isn’t the sharpest tool, but look at it from his perspective. Had we been in his position, would we have fired? I would have.


26 posted on 01/05/2017 2:33:16 PM PST by jbrown7.62x39 (Holy crap. We really are gonna MAGA!! What a great time to be alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
A major thing that didn't help the Titanic was the poor quality of the steel used to build the ship, which made it very brittle in the cold North Atlantic waters. No wonder why after the Titanic sank, White Star Line was forced to make a lot of structural reinforcements to the Olympic and the then-uncompleted Brittanic because they discovered the steel used to build both ships were of lesser quality than expected.
27 posted on 01/05/2017 2:35:36 PM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

The Titanic sank because it had too much water in it...................


28 posted on 01/05/2017 2:36:53 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

“A bunker fire may have reached 1,000°C, but the outside hull steel plates that were in contact with the water never could have reached temperatures high enough to compromise their strength.”

Wouldn’t this apply just to the steel plates making up the outer hull? How about the internal framework, ribbing, bulkheads and whatever the plates are attached to? They would have been subjected to the heat.

Just a thought.


29 posted on 01/05/2017 2:37:04 PM PST by redfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: politicianslie

The Titanic did break in two pieces before it sank.............


30 posted on 01/05/2017 2:38:09 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"The Titanic sank because it had too much water in it..................."

That's right ... the water that should have stayed outside instead moved inside.

31 posted on 01/05/2017 2:44:11 PM PST by BlueLancer ("If the present tries to sit in judgment on the past, it will lose the future." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

“Figure in the cold temperature acting upon it and it made it even worse.”

I can attest to cold temps affecting the strength of metal.

I have a project where I put about a 7,000 lb pull on a building with a 3/8 chain. In the summer the chain does not break and the building moves.

This winter I’m continuing the moving process over ice. At 20F this same chain keeps breaking. Several times. The pull should be less because it’s on ice (not frozen down either).


32 posted on 01/05/2017 2:47:17 PM PST by redfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Ever boil water in a paper cup on a campfire as a scout?

My thought also from trying to solder copper pipes with only a little water in them. Forget it.
I can see fire damaging a bulkhead, hull below the waterline? No.

33 posted on 01/05/2017 2:51:34 PM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

What sank the Titanic? Hitting an iceberg. What many don’t know is the SS Californian was only a few miles away and Titanic’s radio operator ignored the Californian radio warnings of ice. When the warning was sent, the Titanic operator responded “Shut Up, I’m working Cape Race”. The Californian operator complied and the radio was shut off and the Titanic ran into the iceberg within 10 minutes. With no operator on the Californian, they didn’t respond to the distress call. So when people discuss what sank the Titanic, I educate them that it was a rude radio message.


34 posted on 01/05/2017 3:03:49 PM PST by DocRock (And now is the time to fight! Peter Muhlenberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer

If only they had banned Dihydrogen Monoxide.


35 posted on 01/05/2017 3:05:38 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
I am neither German or a leftist. From what I've read, the Soviet sub was within its rights to torpedo the Wilhelm Gustloff. The ship was armed with AAA and because of this, was NOT marked as a hospital ship and was carrying approximately 1,000 Kriegsmarine members. Unfortunately, they also carried 5,000 children and sailed basically unescorted. IF they had ditched the AAA, registered her as a hospital ship with the Red Cross, and painted it as a hospital ship, THEN the S-13 and her skipper would have committed a criminal act. He was within his rights. The Nazis failed we at protecting their civilians.
36 posted on 01/05/2017 3:43:32 PM PST by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

In the early 1970’s I worked on coal carrying ore boats on the Great Lakes (boats on the Lakes are called ships on the oceans). On at least two occasions, our cargo would catch fire and we would see smoke and steam coming out the cargo holds. So it was not impossible for bunker coal to catch fire on the Titanic.


37 posted on 01/05/2017 3:44:23 PM PST by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
There were many things that added up to a disaster.................

Excellent point. In every man made disaster it's usually not one thing. There is a chain of mistakes, any one of which if removed would have prevented the disaster from taking place. The Titanic disaster is a great example of this principle.

38 posted on 01/05/2017 3:46:21 PM PST by henkster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian

Considering what Frau Goebbels did to her children, I don’t think by then the Nazis really cared about their own children anyway.


39 posted on 01/05/2017 3:48:28 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This would depend upon the molecular structure of the metal in question.... if it was the equivalent of an A-36 today it would have little effect... if it contained a little too much carbon in the recipe, well then 1000 degrees over a coupla days would completely compromise the structure of the metal itself and turn it brittle... combine this with the fact that the purchasing agent for the job bought sub standard steel ( this is a documented fact ) and i do believe this is exactly what happened.....


40 posted on 01/05/2017 4:48:00 PM PST by joe fonebone (gay people do not bother me.... fags do...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson