Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Finland to pay unemployed basic income of $587 per month
Associated Press ^ | Jan 2, 2017 1:49 PM EST | Jari Tanner

Posted on 01/02/2017 10:56:17 AM PST by Olog-hai

Finland has become the first country in Europe to pay its unemployed citizens a basic monthly income, amounting to €560 ($587), in a unique social experiment which is hoped to cut government red tape, reduce poverty and boost employment.

Olli Kangas from the Finnish government agency KELA, which is responsible for the country’s social benefits, said Monday that the two-year trial with the 2,000 randomly-picked citizens who receive unemployment benefits kicked off Jan. 1.

Those chosen will receive €560 every month, with no reporting requirements on how they spend it. The amount will be deducted from any benefits they already receive.

The average private sector income in Finland is €3,500 per month, according to official data. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Local News; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: basicincome; delusionalsystem; employment; finland; freemoney; socialism; ubi; unemployment; universalbasicincome
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Olog-hai

So, if you work off the books in Finland you get $587 in beer money? Cool!


21 posted on 01/02/2017 11:56:33 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

So, if you work off the books in Finland you get $587 in beer money? Cool!


22 posted on 01/02/2017 11:58:39 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Let me guess:

Another scheme to pay “migrants” to outbreed their citizens?


23 posted on 01/02/2017 11:58:44 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

OOPS!


24 posted on 01/02/2017 12:00:28 PM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
This has already been done in the U.S., in Native American reservations. Tribes split the profits from casinos and natural gas sales, and other tribe businesses, to every tribe member on the reservation. Sometimes this money is enough to live off of.

The result in one tribe I have some knowledge of is that the Native kids rarely even graduate from high school. The girls start having kids in their teens, which adds to their income. It doesn't have the positive effect these socialists think it will.

25 posted on 01/02/2017 12:02:03 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

They can probably assume a steady percentage of welfare cases. Might save money in the long run on beauracracy and overhead. Recent immigration problems aside, this is a controlled experiment. Glad it’s them trying it first though, and not us.


26 posted on 01/02/2017 12:47:48 PM PST by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professional

It’s only an experiment with 2,000 Finns for 2 years.
You probably have to speak Finnish to apply for the assistance and that is no easy language to learn.
Not sure why you think all Finns are on drugs or booze.
Finland is not part of Scandinavia.


27 posted on 01/02/2017 12:58:49 PM PST by alpo (Resist we much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Ever since the Soviets took them over in 1939, the Finns have done bizarre things. Maybe Putin should declare their freedom again.


28 posted on 01/02/2017 1:25:20 PM PST by Theodore R. (Let's not squander the golden opportunity of 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

A guaranteed income is probably better than the current welfare system with a gazillion govt employees living off the government poverty industry. But the massive goverent employee system must be ended with it. As well as ending all other government subsidiaries; food stamps, free this free that, which keeps the socialists in power. A simple system based on income tax return, direct deposited monthly. Otherwise this massive government welfare poverty industry system will just continue to grow and empower the socialists in politics.

If anyone thinks the welfare system can just be ended by politics with the massive unemployment numbers we have and the coming robot implementation of all employment sectors is dreaming.


29 posted on 01/02/2017 1:25:44 PM PST by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alpo

Finns are Asiatics, not Scandinavians, but people glancing at the map think all four peninsulas are Scandinavian.


30 posted on 01/02/2017 1:26:27 PM PST by Theodore R. (Let's not squander the golden opportunity of 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
This kind of basic income payment system will become a standard feature of life in all western countries in the next 25 years, if not sooner.

Automating technology makes it unavoidable. Driver-less tech can get rid of all transport operators in the next 2-3 years. That is 5-6% of the workforce right there.

31 posted on 01/02/2017 1:28:57 PM PST by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

[Driver-less tech in the next 2-3 years]

Driver-less tech is 200 years in the future. You may wish to begin reading about science.

Nuclear fusion is 20 years away, again and again.

Every sci fi movie is off by 100s of years.

Driver-less tech is not even proven feasible yet.


32 posted on 01/02/2017 1:50:38 PM PST by TheNext (Hillary LOST the POPULAR VOTE by 7 mil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TheNext
Driver-less tech is 200 years in the future.

Three months ago

33 posted on 01/02/2017 2:06:25 PM PST by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: econjack

From the article: “the selected persons would continue to receive the 560 euros even after receiving a job”

This is an experiment where the money goes to 2000 randomly selected citizens. They keep getting it even if they get a job. Currently many people there and here in the US do not accept work that causes their unemployment benefits to be diminished.

In Texas you can earn a certain amount without losing unemployment benefits, so the money can serve to help someone who is underemployed as well.

The biggest problem with money from the government (after government incompetency) is that it is almost always means-tested.

What would happen if the only qualification for any government benefit is that you are a citizen?

While that alone would not eliminate government waste, it might go a long way.


34 posted on 01/02/2017 2:17:38 PM PST by unlearner (11/8/2016 - a new beginning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheNext; Poison Pill

“Driver-less tech is 200 years in the future. You may wish to begin reading about science.”

Try 10 years.

Today, there are ports where shipping containers are unloaded and sorted with zero human intervention. It’s 100% automated.

Robotics, AI, and similar technologies are getting pretty close to, and in some cases have exceeded, many sci-fi predictions.

The biggest obstacle to self-driving cars being on the road immediately is not even road conditions. It is human drivers.

This is NOT even a technological challenge. That part is 98% solved, door-to-door. It is a regulatory challenge to accommodate human drivers.

As Elon Musk said, eventually, human drivers will be illegal.

Where do you see horse-drawn carriages on the roads today?


35 posted on 01/02/2017 2:28:06 PM PST by unlearner (11/8/2016 - a new beginning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Since most socialists are in favor of “abolition of the family”, a preponderance of teen births out of wedlock is “positive” to them.


36 posted on 01/02/2017 2:31:34 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

Nope; Musk is wrong.


37 posted on 01/02/2017 2:32:26 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Nope; Musk is wrong.

Even if it never becomes illegal, a car with a driver's interface may not be available to buy. Or operator's insurance would be $1000 per month. Either way, the effect would be the same.

38 posted on 01/02/2017 2:44:04 PM PST by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

Then nobody would buy those cars.


39 posted on 01/02/2017 2:45:49 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I prefer manual transmission vehicles. So do lots and lots of other people. But we are getting older and fewer cars every year offer the feature. Kids today don’t learn on them. Very soon they will be gone.


40 posted on 01/02/2017 2:54:25 PM PST by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson