Posted on 12/11/2016 5:17:54 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda
Russian Interference Could Give Courts Legal Authority To Install Clinton
A 1995 federal court ruling out of Pennsylvania may offer some clues to Clinton supporters as to possible legal authority for removing an elected official from office and replacing them with their erstwhile opponent.
In light of late-breaking reports Friday evening that Russians interfered with the 2016 presidential election to assist Donald Trump’s victory, Clinton supporters are furiously in pursuit of remedies.
At 10:45 p.m. Friday evening, the Washington Post broke an explosive story alleging that Russians had interfered with the 2016 presidential election in order to assist Donald Trump in a victory over democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. The story reveals that a CIA assessment detailing this conclusion had been presented to President Obama and top congressional leaders last week.
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...
I shudder to think where this kind of insanity will lead...
#13
TRump/Putin
Story of the Century ... developing
impy gets so much reply cuz his name is easy to type
unlike me
Hey, there are limits! NOT psychic mind rays.
HA!
The “interference” if any, was limited to letting the truth out about Hillary’s CRIMES.
Silly me. DU hasn’t woke up yet, they still have yesterday’s news.
the only name I know that got busted for subverting an election was Debbie Wasserman-Shits, who took down Bernie Sanders and subsequently became an employee of Hillary Clinton
That and if it’s not the whitest country right now, it soon will be. They’re not importing non white people.
LOL....all it proves is that you have to be brain dead to be a democrat.
EVEN if Russians hacked emails, how can anyone say that is the cause of her loss, and not her own behavior, lying and changing her story in public repeatedly for more than a year? Seems to me, the person most harmed by the leaks is Debbie Blabbermouth Shultz, not Hillary.
How does getting to see who democrats really are in their own words give the courts legal authority to install Clinton????? Hey US, you voted against the world order and corruption because you got to see information democrats did not want you to see, we are going to force it down your throats anyway and install Hillary over you......yep, that should go over well. Would your really want to be a democrat, the media or a judge 2 seconds after that hits home to Americans????
These articles have just gotten stupid.
“some legal authority on point that implies courts could seat Clinton instead.”
I would just LOVE to know what “legal authority” that might be.
Don’t let them scare you. Congress is the only body that can install the president. Judges cannot.
If this would even have a snails chance in hell to succeed to a court, wouldn’t counter defense be that Hillary was SOS and via CF dealings, allowed our Uranium to be sold to Russia? Russia had more of a reason to help Hillary then hinder.
If this would even have a snails chance in hell to succeed to a court, wouldn’t counter defense be that Hillary was SOS and via CF dealings, allowed our Uranium to be sold to Russia? Russia had more of a reason to help Hillary then hinder.
Excellent statement.
jughandle wrote:
“Not too long ago the democrats threw a royal fit when they believed a court decided a presidential election. Now they’re demanding a court decide a presidential election...”
Florida 2000, difference of about 2000 votes or less..
PA/MI/WI, difference ofover 70000 votes in those 3 States.
Excellent post. Well said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.