Mismatched numbers means precincts can't be recounted
And here is the Wayne County Clerk site. Wayne County Clerk
Don't walk past the cemeteries on voting day, you'll be trampled.
If I recall, the 85,000 votes were Non-Votes for President. Votes were cast for down ballot candidates, but none for President. I think the last election there were 45 K Non-votes for President or something close to that.
Ballots, shmallots.
In RAT-dominated precincts, it is not unusual to have more votes cast than the total number of registered voters, and even the number of registered voters is suspect. The whole system is corrupt. How else would RATS ever win?
What’s there to know? Cheating is done by the Democrats. Trump is the man to do something about it. Didn’t stop them.
Chebk out Milwaukee recounts vs original counts.
Hillary’s numbers are way down since the recount
Looks kind of strange, but sometimes data seems strange to those of us who do not understand every aspect of the process.
How nice. If you want to commit fraud, go ahead, and then spoil the ballots by reporting a wrong number and no one will ever recount them.
There is ALWAYS funny business whenever it comes to blue states and the deep blue “pockets” that always keep them that way.
Do you have the correct figures?
http://www.waynecounty.com/documents/exec/clerk/16gsumrp.pdf#toolbar=1&view=FitH
Was gonna send a link to this to your earlier post...
Have to assume it’s the result of cheating.
Shocking that the Republican government isn’t doing anything about it.
Of course the national media won’t publicize it since it doesn’t fit their narrative.
In another heavily Democrat Mich County:
“Chad Livengood ;@ChadLivengood · 3h3 hours ago
#MichiganRecount update from Ingham County since recount started around 12:30PM: 24 precincts recounted, six were not recountable.”
“six were not recountable...”
You may want to relook the rest of your numbers using ballots and not pages.
Has it dawned on the liberal media that neither candidate appealed to everybody? I mean, if you don’t like either candidate, you are allowed to leave it blank.
“97% voter turnout”
******************************
I do believe you need to go back into the reports and reassess how you came up with your turnout figure.
thanks
Stein has targeted about 85,000 ‘blank votes’ or ‘no-votes’. These are votes that voted but did not mark or vote for president. In other words, some voters chose not to vote for either Clinton or Trump. Many people know of such voters so it’s not surprising or unexpected.
The 85,000 votes you mention may be the 85,000 that Stein mentioned.
Trump won by about 11,000 and Stein thinks there are at least that number in the 85,000 no-votes. She wants to create a ‘hanging chad’ situation where stray marks, smudges, etc. are indicating a vote for Clinton.
The precinct in Colorado that includes Aspen had Democrat turnout of 105% and Republican turnout of 105%. I think the Republican fake votes all went to hillary too ->.
The democrats hard at work.