Posted on 11/25/2016 2:43:54 PM PST by doghorse
Anybody else hear CNN say the recount was "for several counties in Wisconsin"
Qayne county is in Michigan and is the county of Detroit. I don’t believe there is a Wayne County Wisconsin.
There is no Wayne County in Wisconsin.
Just Milwaukee County and Dane County, our own versions of Broward and Dade.
I predict all liberal run counties with the big liberal cities in them. Dane/Madison. Milwaukee. La Crosse. Green Bay. Racine and Kenosha.
The liberals probably have all the extra fake ballots ready to go, because this year they couldn’t bus people up from Illinois to vote because we greatly reduced that method of cheating with voter ID.
I won’t believe the law is on the people’s side until January 20.
Hey - CNN - Not according to the petitions filed.
can be found here:
http://elections.wi.gov/node/4436
Clinton lost PA by nearly 70K. LOL! Good luck flipping that one too.
Even MI is 10K. For comparison, FL was ONLY 1,300 in 2000. These people are nuts.
That’s the way it is since Bush Vs Gore.
Stein obviously is looking to uncover more D votes in Milwaukee and Dane.
Rest of the rest would uncover more R votes for Trump.
That’s exactly why she is asking for a recount in only some counties.
Not allowed.
Except it's my understanding that the way these electronic systems works, it is impossible to manufacture the old "missing" ballot box in the car trunk". The counties either use all electronic or optical scan systems, in which a "missing" machine total or ballots that were generated but not scanned would have been noticed instantly and flagged on election night. As for "fraudulent" absentee ballots, they had to be postmarked by election day, so that's a non-starter as well.
Which is the reason, I'm guessing, Trump and crew aren't even giving this recount a second thought and are pretty much just ignoring it...
This “voter intent” is what is fishy. I read there were over 80,000 undervotes for the Presidential race. I guess they look at a ballot like that and if one democrat was voted for on the ballot it then gets counted for Hillary. Having a few republicans also selected on the same ballot would not be sufficient evidence to give it to Trump.
Time for the governor’s office to personally oversee the recount.
The totals on election night are just preliminary, but are pretty accurate. The actual ballot count in WI, and most states, takes place in front of a canvassing board in each county. The canvassing board is made up of an equal number of Dems and Republicans.
You might sneak a few hundred ballots statewide into the recount, but Trump won by 27,000 votes. Hard to manufacture that many votes with Republicans looking on.
> Which counties are they recounting?
The ones where they’ve been busy creating boxes of forged ballots since November 8, I expect.
Maybe they are shooting for an Al Franken victory by theft. By the Stein has NO standing, she will not win a single elector even by the most liberal standard.
After the election Hitlery got an additional 1.5million votes in California that all came from Los Angeles County. How very queer.
So she wants to only recount “their” counties yet take ALL the EVs. I don’t think so.
goldstategop wrote: “Illegal under Bush vs Gore. It has to be a statewide recount. Stein campaign CANNOT cherry-pick counties as basis for a recount. I expect petition to be denied.”
Bush v. Gore ruled that the same standards had to be applied across the board. It did not require a state wide recount.
In fact: “The Supreme Court, in a per curiam opinion, ruled that the Florida Supreme Court’s decision, calling for a statewide recount, violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This ruling was by a 7–2 vote, but (as discussed more fully in the next subsection below) two of the seven disagreed with the Court’s remedy for the Equal Protection violation.[30] The Court held that the Equal Protection Clause guarantees to individuals that their ballots cannot be devalued by “later arbitrary and disparate treatment”. Even if the recount was fair in theory, it was unfair in practice. The record, as weighed by the Florida Supreme Court, suggested that different standards were seemingly applied to the recount from ballot to ballot, precinct to precinct, and county to county, even when identical types of ballots and machines were used.[34]” wikipedia.
Here we go again...how can anyone determine voter intent for another person?
I believe in Wisconsin we audit random counties after an election as a process to insure accuracy and honesty. This may be what CNN was referring to?
Election Recount Manual - 2016
http://elections.wi.gov/sites/default/files/publication/65/recount_manual_11_2016_pdf_17034.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.