I understand that and I agree. She has a case as a parent to be rightfully pissed off - I agree. I’m just saying she also has a duty to protect herself from potential future debt caused by decisions of others who totally by passed her rights as a parent. What they have done is to potentially incur debt for her for something to which she never agreed.
It’s just amazing to me that the “medical” providers will do irreversible surgery on minors, but most won’t see them for an office visit on their own
Poor woman has a total fag for a “son.”
WE the people, not; we want someone else to take all the hits for us, the people.
GOOD PEOPLE ..... GET ON THE SCHOOL BOARD.
IT'S OUR FIRST LINE OF DEFENSE.