Posted on 11/05/2016 4:08:07 PM PDT by AlmaKing
Ste Kinney-Fields created the maps below. They’re all based on data from from fivethirtyeight and 270towin.
The maps show the 2016 presidential outcomes based on select voter outcomes.
There are electoral vote maps by groups, men, women, white, black, etc.
The results:
•People of Colour*: Clinton 538, Trump: 0
•Women: Clinton 461, Trump: 71
•College Educated Whites: Clinton 216, Trump: 322
•White Women: Clinton 211, Trump: 327
•White People: Clinton 169, Trump: 369
•Men: Clinton 158, Trump: 350
•Non-College educated Whites: Clinton 64, Trump: 474
•White Men: Clinton 45, Trump: 493
All this map tells me is that if you want to meet a decent gal, you have to go to the non-coastal South, or the Rocky Mountains.
It will forever remain a mystery to me why liberals want to phase out white people.
Because the liberal leadership is white. They hate themselves.
Consider if your life was totally Godless - whether you're religious or not - if your life was entirely dedicated to self righteous concepts, hating people, gratifying your physical impulses, zero connection to principle ... literally your entire world and life the creation of undisciplined thoughts you believe are your own and various hypnoses running through your mind.
They are sick, they hate themselves, and they externalize and project what they hate onto any white person who disagrees with them.
They don't KNOW they hate themselves - they think it's YOU they hate ... but the 'you' they experience is just a projection of themselves. They are confused zombies, mistaking incessant thinking for intelligence.
To be a liberal is not only to cause a lot of Hell for others, but it is also to live in Hell.
“All this map tells me is that if you want to meet a decent gal, you have to go to the non-coastal South, or the Rocky Mountains.”
Well, LA, MS, and AL are coastal South.
Or the Midwest :)
“It will forever remain a mystery to me why liberals want to phase out white people.”
Most liberals are white, and they are, deep down, self-loathing. Thus, they want to eliminate anyone who looks like them.
However, if one were looking for a white woman, one could pretty much get to draw from a wide range.
Only if you are not attracted to white women.
All the cucks seem to live in Oregon, Washington, Massechusetts, Vermont and Maine.
>>However, if one were looking for a white woman, one could pretty much get to draw from a wide range.<<
I think if you check out his maps you will also find single women are twice as likely as married women to vote for Cankles. As a single man there simply aren’t enough conservative women to go around.
And if only the dead voted....
I don’t have anything against black women. You?
Is it causation or correlation? Does marriage make women more conservative or are conservative women more likely to marry? I venture there is more evidence pointing to the latter. However, I would think that some Dem-leaning women who are not hardcore leftists could be swayed over time.
“I don’t have anything against black women. You?”
Nice try. My comment reflected the map that was posted (the map was titled White Women).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.