Posted on 11/01/2016 12:40:09 PM PDT by RummyChick
That is a verified legitimate account that released the Clinton info
Not a whole lot in it. Lots of redaction. But Page 65 starts the Marc Rich pardon stuff....
I tried to post this just now
but FR wont allow it in news
Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign is raising questions about the timing of the FBI’s release Tuesday of records on a 15-year-old investigation into President Bill Clinton’s pardon to fugitive financier Marc Rich.
The FBI posted the 129 pages of records in its online Freedom of Information Act reading room in apparent response to a FOIA request seeking information on FBI inquiries into the Clinton Foundation.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/marc-rich-pardon-files-230590#ixzz4OmeC7HC2
My understanding that the release of all the information there is due to Freedom Of Information Act requests.
“The Clinton campaign, which is already at odds with FBI Director James Comey over his disclosure of new evidence in the Clinton email probe, immediately questioned why Clinton-related records were being released just a week before the election.
“Absent a FOIA litigation deadline, this is odd. Will FBI be posting docs on Trump’s housing discrimination in ’70s?” Clinton press secretary Brian Fallon asked on Twitter.”
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/marc-rich-pardon-files-230590#ixzz4OmeC7HC2
Bill Clinton
1h
Editor’s note: The FBI has released 129 pages of redacted documents related to the William J. Clinton Foundation and a 2001 investigation into the pardon of Marc Rich. Clinton was criticized for pardoning Rich, who fled to Switzerland after being indicted for tax evasion, illegal trading with Iran and other charges. Rich’s former wife had made large donations to the Democratic party and Clinton library, The New York Times reports. Funds for the library were raised through the William J. Clinton Foundation - not the more well-known nonprofit Clinton Foundation. The FBI investigated the pardon in 2001 and it was closed in 2005, according to the agency. NBC News reports the documents were released following a public records request related to the WJC Foundation, and notes that there is little information in these documents that wasn’t reported on at the time. The FBI is currently being criticized for publicly announcing a review of emails that may be linked to the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private server use. - Stephanie
Read more on vault.fbi.gov
breakingnews.com
Harumph! how dare the FBI post anything about the Clinton’s corruption? Some nerve!
Did you go through it at all?
There are so many redacted contents that most pages have nothing on them :) no conclusion one way or the other.
Yeah I found out the other night that you can only post political in Bloggers now.
Just remember that only a day or two prior there is a release there on Donald Trumps father. You don’t hear Donald crying about it.
No, I haven’t read it it yet. Just wondering if this is a shot in the internal war.
As Hillary’s campaign said..why release it now even if FOIA if there isn’t a deadline
Timing may be related to Judicial Watch, but why is it on the Vault's twitter feed?
This might be part of the FBI mutiny against DOJ meddling in the Clinton case. AAG Peter J. Kadzik, a BFF of the Clinton Global Crime Family is supervising the multi-office FBI probe of "The Foundation." Why he is allowed to do that, nobody knows.
He is up to his neck in their sh!t; he defended Podesta on perjury charges when Podesta lied about his involvement in the Monica Lewinsky case, and his son now works for Podesta in the Clinton campaign, and he was the gopher tasked with defending the Mark Rich pardon. He has consistently refused to recuse himself from Clinton Global Crime Family investigations, so the timing of this tweet is a little intriguing.
As far as I could tell, there was not single piece of relevant information in that so-called "FBI File" -- that had not been deleted (page gone) or redacted (covered with a black-bordered, white rectangle).
~~~~~~~~~~
Did you ever ask why (or, better, IF) the FBI would ever use a Twitter link to their "file vault"?
Are you feeling "snookered", yet...?
Have you paid attention in the past to the FBIVault’s twitter feed to know their M.O.?
I never even knew it existed so I have no knowledge as to how they normally operate.
DEFINITELY a shot by the FBI.
And apparently the file does indicated clinton bent rules to get Rich a pardon.
But there was never any indictment...
Of course, we NOW know that Bush is a traitor too so 2005 is a year in which he would NEVER have been indicted.
Still CANT believe the Bushes are voting for hillary!!
No, it is their OFFICIAL twitter page. It is verified.
A lot is redacted but I saw where it does indicate that the pardon was likely illegal.
If the war is really heating up within the FBI this release is a way to show that Clinton’s have a history of doing things that are illegal....even if most of the file is redacted.
This is why I posted the information because I think this was a shot at Clinton. Wonder if Obama approves or is fuming.
Time to dig out the old Impeachment Document the Freepers put together.
Maybe they shouldn’t have named a guy who lobbied for Mark Rich’s pardon as the lawyer in charge of the e-mail investigation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.