Skip to comments.BOMBSHELL VIDEO: Trump Was Right! Watch This Voting Machine Switch Its Vote…
Posted on 10/26/2016 7:35:18 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
We all knew that the voting machines are rigged Here is the video proof.
Trump was right. Where is the New York Times? Where is the Washington Post? Where are our esteemed reporters? There are citizens doing your job.
Like this citizen below, yall. The on in the video, yall. Here is an alleged video of an election machine switching votes in the swing state of Virginia.
You have literally watched corruption take place.
Watch that video above. That is a computer programmer in Florida that testified before a congressional panel that there are computer programs that can secretly fix elections. This happened in 2001, but you would have never seen this on the mainstream media.
*** Share this everywhere!
Document everything at the polls. We need to be able to fight the rigging. God bless all the Trump voters and share this post if you are voting Trump on Nov. 8th.
Together we can make America great again.
US elections, rigged and computer codes. ELECTION FRAUD!
Computer Programmer Testimony He Was Requested to Write Code to Rig U.S. Elections
“US elections, rigged and computer code,”
HOORAY Paris Swade
Calm down a bit... this was a previous election.
Scott Rigel was Congress 2nd District (Virginia Beach, VA). He is not running this year. He also is a turncoat Republican who has come out against Trump and changed his affiliation to Independent. The candidate taking his place is a former Navy Seal that is pro-Trump.
Good riddance Rigell!
Don’t get baited into looking like an alarmist - be calm and double check dates and locations before you start to ring the bell...
old info and video
Video is over a year old from a different election.
I hate to say it but this video which has been posted multiple times is probably a hoax. Ask yourself why the right hand of the screen is cut off? And then ask yourself where is the guys right hand?
I wonder that they show their hand with the obvious vote switching. It is much easier and less transparent to do the job in big batches at the hub servers. All it takes is the password and a couple of keystrokes to switch column A with column B for all the machines in a county. It can be done in less than a minute. Paper ballots counted several times by different counters is the answer. Even those will be affected by chicanery but the fraud has to be perpetrated one voting station at a time. It takes a LOT of manpower. With the digital machines far fewer tamperers are required and it can be done in batch lots.
Soros saying Trump will win the vote in a landslide, but will lose the election:
We do have reports of this being done at several locations in Texas which is partly why Texas went to paper ballots and ballot boxes.
Uber lib Austin, TX keye SeeBS local news at 10 pm had a segment on how nearly impossible it is to rig a voting machine.
Part of a Russian disinformation campaign...?
That’s my conspiracy theory of the moment...
Come on now! Don’t post old crap!!
You’ve posted this before. It was pulled due to being from 2014. And you now post it again.
I was unaware this information had been verified as fraudulent or posted and pulled. If voter equipment is NOT malfunctioning GREAT!
The potential for voter fraud this election concerns me greatly. I have read reports that voting machines are recasting ballots from Trump to Clinton. Perhaps, the fraud of previous elections will reoccur in 2016 recasting relevance of this thread? i.e.
“As Americans, we want our elections to be fair and transparent. We want to know that when a candidate gets most of the votes, she, he, or they are the person who will be take office. It would hurt us to our core if our right to choose the ones that represent us were violated.
With this in mind, are the outcomes of the 2016 Democratic Party nomination contest completely legitimate? A number of anecdotal and journalistic accounts suggest that this is not the case.
Together with Axel Geijsel, from Tilburg University (The Netherlands), we reasoned that, if anyone were to have rigged the elections, it would be most evident by comparing the outcomes of states wherein it is possible to check the legitimacy of the placed votes to the states that cannot provide this evidence. For example, California offers a small receipt that is torn off from the voting ballot, while certain other states do not.
What we found is that, on average, states that do not have paper trails were won by Secretary Clinton at a rate of about 65%. In contrast, in the states that do have a paper trail, the Secretary won at a rate of about 49%. These differences were statistically significant.”
Axel Geijsel Tilburg University, Netherlands. Rodolfo Cortes Barragan Stanford University, U.S.A. “Are we witnessing a dishonest election? A between state comparison based on the used voting procedures of the 2016 Democratic Party Primary for the Presidency of the United States of America” June 7, 2016. https://www.scribd.com/doc/315120550/Geijsel-CortesBarragan-2016-a-Dishonest-Election
However, Mea culpa if I have given any offense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.