An ex-Rutgers [female] professor raped a man with cerebral palsy

Toronto Sun ^ | Oct. 26, 2016 | Derek Hawkins

[Sybeck1]

Wouldn’t a woman raping a man require arousal on his part, and if so mean he was willing?

[Manly Warrior]

The victim wasn’t a man per se, but rather a toddler wearing an adult body. Age of consent is not cut and dried past the age of 18, mental ability factors in a nd becomes primary age determining factor.

[gathersnomoss]

But the question is, will she still be allowed to vote for Crooked?

[dainbramaged]

Mental retardation and Cerebral Palsy are not the same thing and should not be confused. Mental retardation relates to brain function as it pertains to learning and cognitive abilities. Cerebral Palsy is the term given to a variety of impairments that involve the motor function of the body; how the muscles work.
Approximately 65% of individuals with Cerebral Palsy will exhibit mental impairments or mental retardation. Of those, roughly one-third are classified as mildly impaired and the other third are moderately to severely impaired. The remaining 35% will have normal intelligence which can include above average intelligence.

[dirtymac]

Will she still get to vote for Hillary?

Of course but only 9 times. The felony convictions causes her to lose one of her votes.

[the_daug]

It was an incredible assertion. D.J. likely could not have even have grasped what was happening, much less reciprocated Stubblefield's feelings.

I worked at a facility while in collage and I think this assertion is probably wrong. Clients regularly engaged themselves in self stimulation and grabbed the girls working on the floor. Clients not able to self stimulate became aroused during bathing and cleaning during depends change. Most clients where I worked were not ambulatory. In cottages where clients were able to communicate they would ask for sex often and touch with intent to stimulate.

[Tax-chick]

Would she be “not guilty” if she was pretty, or does the man’s mental impairment affect this factor?

[utahagen]

Punishments should be the same for women as for men in these situations, no question. A distinction I'd make — and it is one that has no moral significance — is that sometimes peoples’ motivations may be “nuts”, but that doesn't make their actions any less evil. A man who was attracted to a mildly simple-minded but physically beautiful sixteen year old girl would be not be “nuts” in his motivation, but would be morally depraved and criminal if he acted on it. In this situation, that a woman of high intelligence would be romantically/sexually attracted to a mentally and severely physically impaired man is indeed “sick”, but that “sickness” does not mitigate the simple depravity and illegality of her actions in manipulating him and acting on her attraction. So, I do agree with those who assert that this woman is “nuts”, but I think she also is “evil”. Being crazy (in the non-legally insane sense) and being bad are not mutually exclusive.

[Secret Agent Man]

Yes but in the law being nuts excuses you from the punishment of the evil you did.

You cant say shes nuts or she skates. This predisposition to want women to be nuts by people because we cannot handle the reality of women being evil is destroying justice in our country.

Every evil person has reasons for being evil. That is just explanation. With women its used as excuses to get them lesser sentences or off the hook completely. It just has to stop.

[ladyjane]

This is a very depressing story.

This is a very biased story. There is a lot more to it. Follow the money.

[utahagen]

“...in the law being nuts excuses you from the punishment of the evil you did.”

If her lawyer is asserting some kind insanity defense, then, no way, Jose. She’s guilty. I meant just that, if I were sitting across the table from you, I’d tell you I’d think she is crazy AND evil.

(And I agree that no one, male or female, should escape a guilty verdict for violent crimes on account of flimsy psychological excuses. Real legal insanity is, at it should be a very high bar for a defense lawyer to meet.)

[Mrs. Don-o]

Tagline

[Tax-chick]

In most of the situations of women’s having sex with men or boys under illegal conditions, the issue is “resolved” by saying the man/boy was physically gratified. Often there’s a psychological element introduced regarding the woman’s appearance. Why is this not another, “It’s against the law but ... *snicker*” situation?

(Please note that I am attacking the reasoning behind the, “He enjoyed it,” “defense”, rather than the law.)

[Tax-chick]

OH, good one!

[Mrs. Don-o]

No.

First, arousal does not mean consent Otherwise Dr. Kinsey's pedophiles had "consent" from infants.

Second, female-on-male rape does not require male arousal. She could be sticking things up his anus.

Sorry for the filthy details.

[Talisker]

Incredibly true.

Puts paid to virtually all of modern philosophy.

[Talisker]

Well said. The only reason Hillary has a chance is the false moral pedestal upon which feminism has installed women as an entire sex. It’s got to go - it’s destroying the world.

[Talisker]

In most of the situations of women’s having sex with men or boys under illegal conditions, the issue is “resolved” by saying the man/boy was physically gratified. Often there’s a psychological element introduced regarding the woman’s appearance. Why is this not another, “It’s against the law but ... *snicker*” situation? (Please note that I am attacking the reasoning behind the, “He enjoyed it,” “defense”, rather than the law.)

Yep. She wanted to get off and used the physiological erection she no doubt personally stimulated to do it. End of story. He couldn't stop her, is the only reason she did it. Rape, period. And pathetic at that.

[Tax-chick]

The only reason Hillary has a chance is the false moral pedestal upon which feminism has installed women as an entire sex.

I disagree. I think it's more important that Hillary is "The Democrat Candidate" than that she is "A Woman." The Democrat Candidate starts out with about 48% of the popular vote, even if he's a fried egg on toast.

[Tax-chick]

Rape, period. And pathetic at that.

I agree, but where does that leave the "hot" teacher with a 14-year-old boy?

"Just good clean fun"?

"Did him a favor"?