Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick
In most of the situations of women’s having sex with men or boys under illegal conditions, the issue is “resolved” by saying the man/boy was physically gratified. Often there’s a psychological element introduced regarding the woman’s appearance. Why is this not another, “It’s against the law but ... *snicker*” situation? (Please note that I am attacking the reasoning behind the, “He enjoyed it,” “defense”, rather than the law.)

Yep. She wanted to get off and used the physiological erection she no doubt personally stimulated to do it. End of story. He couldn't stop her, is the only reason she did it. Rape, period. And pathetic at that.

38 posted on 10/26/2016 2:17:46 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker
Rape, period. And pathetic at that.

I agree, but where does that leave the "hot" teacher with a 14-year-old boy?

"Just good clean fun"?

"Did him a favor"?

40 posted on 10/26/2016 2:21:21 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Stop that. You're going to set the fire alarm off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson