Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America’s hidden crisis: Men not at work (Barf alert!)
TheGlobeAndMail.com (Canada) | 15OCT2016 | Margaret Wente

Posted on 10/22/2016 6:08:37 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine

I think we can all let our breath out now. Donald Trump is finished. Hillary Clinton will win. A great calamity will be averted.

Ms. Clinton probably won’t face an immediate financial crisis, as U.S. President Barack Obama did in 2008. The United States’ biggest problem at the moment is more insidious. Millions of able-bodied men have dropped out of society – out of working life, of civic life, of family life. Many of these men belong to the Trumpenproletariat. How to re-engage them may be the biggest domestic challenge the country faces.

Political economist Nicholas Eberstadt calls these men “the unworking,” to distinguish them from people who want work but can’t find it. “America is now home to a vast army of jobless men who are no longer even looking for work,” he writes. “Roughly seven million of them age 25 to 54, the traditional prime of working life.” His new book, Men Without Work: America’s Invisible Crisis, is essential reading for this election cycle. “For every prime-age man who is unemployed today,” he writes, “another three are neither working nor looking for work.” Most of these men are less educated, and many, particularly blacks, have prison records.

The standard argument goes that globalization and technology are responsible for the vast destruction of working-class jobs. And that’s true. But in fact, the work rate has been in decline for two generations. What happened during those decades was a massive shift in cultural values.

Not so long ago, virtually all men in their prime worked. The only exceptions were the disabled and the feeble-minded. Work was integral to what it was to be a man, and not to work was shameful. That’s no longer true. Today, a man can choose a no-work lifestyle as an option – and plenty do. They’re quite happy to sit around and watch TV, sponging off the government, their relatives and their girlfriends.

The eminent economist Lawrence Summers does not believe this is a blip. He says it’s more like a snowball. “Everything we hear and see regarding technology suggests the rate of job destruction will pick up,” he wrote in The Washington Post. He’s also worried about social contagion. “To the extent that non-work is contagious, it is likely to grow exponentially rather than at a linear rate.” If current trends continue, he expects that more than one-third of all men in the 25-54 age group will be out of work by mid-century. That is a truly terrifying prospect – as well as fertile soil for toxic populism.

At its root, the collapse of the working class isn’t so much economic as it is social, moral and spiritual. This means that economic remedies will only take us so far. Marriage rates for less-educated men have plunged – and unmarried men are far more likely to opt for unwork. The percentage of babies born to unmarried parents has soared. Working-class whites have largely abandoned church (while church attendance among higher-income whites has stayed relatively high). Family and community networks have dissolved.

Meanwhile, opiate addictions are ripping through the Rust Belt like a plague. For the first time in history, death rates among white, less educated, middle-aged Americans are actually going up – mostly because of drug and alcohol poisoning, suicides and liver disease. Angus Deaton, the Nobel-winning economist who documented the phenomenon with his wife and fellow Princeton economist Anne Case, calls them “deaths of despair.” Women are not spared. “Across the country, middle-aged white women are dying at staggeringly higher rates, particularly from drug overdoses, suicides and excessive drinking,” reports The Washington Post in a harrowing investigative series. One reason: Women have gained a social licence to drink and smoke like men.

Today, to crib a line from Marx, opiates are the opiate of the masses. We’re not supposed to say it’s anybody’s fault, of course – talk of blame and personal responsibility are taboo in public policy. But the more that undesirable behaviour is normalized, the more people will behave that way. “I have known a lot of people who like to get up in the morning and start getting high (pot, THC, whatever),” one reader commented, in response to an erudite discussion of working-class woes on an economics website. “I have trouble relating to that because I do not have that desire at all but none of them seemed to be in any particular despair. As far as I could tell it was entertainment.”

So good luck to Ms. Clinton. The flight of working men could be her biggest socioeconomic challenge. An economic revival might help. A spiritual revival might help, too. If only we had a clue how to do that.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 10/22/2016 6:08:37 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Commentary by some Canadian guy on this article.

People STILL haven’t figured out why men are opting out of work and family...
by Raging Golden Eagle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPmm4Fm_BsA


2 posted on 10/22/2016 6:09:33 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Historically, the reason why men worked hard was so they would qualify to get a good wife. With marriage losing attraction for men, why work? Men don’t need a big house in the suburbs, they can survive just fine with part time work, or figuring out a way to get Disability.


3 posted on 10/22/2016 6:14:59 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

“Roughly seven million of them age 25 to 54, the traditional prime of working life.”

Wait just a minute here..obama and the news outlets tell us the unemployment rate has never been lower...??


4 posted on 10/22/2016 6:18:27 AM PDT by jughandle (Big words anger me, keep talking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

Give me a comfortable hole in the ground and I’ll be fine.


5 posted on 10/22/2016 6:18:52 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Sure, go to work, get a good paying job and fund 10 freeloaders with your income.

NOT!


6 posted on 10/22/2016 6:19:07 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jughandle

And all those no longer in the workforce have retired...


7 posted on 10/22/2016 6:21:49 AM PDT by Chicory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

Sure, if you have no moral center and self worth.


8 posted on 10/22/2016 6:26:55 AM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

And why are middle-aged women committing suicide or dying from drugs and alcohol? Because they followed the feminist plan: they spent their 20’s going after charming Alpha males, who were fine with keeping the company of women they had no interest in marrying (as long as there was plenty of no-strings sex) .

Then these women arrive at their 40’s : the charming Alpha males their own age have lost interest, the men interested in marriage have been taken, and the men who are left either dont excite them, or are uninterested in marrying a used-up party girl.


9 posted on 10/22/2016 6:30:21 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

If current trends continue, he expects that more than one-third of all men in the 25-54 age group will be out of work by mid-century. That is a truly terrifying prospect – as well as fertile soil for toxic populism.


So populism & national self interest are “toxic”, while this is just okay?


10 posted on 10/22/2016 6:32:03 AM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
This author demonstrates the classic psychological condition called "liberal-phrenia." She sweats relief that Donald Trump will not be elected, that a disaster has been narrowly averted, thereby proclaiming her liberal (amoral and brainless, but I repeat myself) "values."

She then goes on to lament a series of social conditions all directly the results of liberal policies and the very values represented by Hillary Clinton.

It's like the village idiot running into a door, getting back up and running into the door again, getting back up ... Then he accosts a passer-by and demands to know why his head hurts.

11 posted on 10/22/2016 6:36:31 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

“So good luck to Ms. Clinton. The flight of working men could be her biggest socioeconomic challenge. “

Her solution is easy:

Start a war, send them all over to die, eliminate a whole class of domestic political enemies.

Kills two birds with one stone.


12 posted on 10/22/2016 6:37:58 AM PDT by JPJones (George Washington's Tariffs were Patriotic. Build a Wall and Build a Wall of tariffs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jughandle

“Roughly seven million of them age 25 to 54, the traditional prime of working life.”
Wait just a minute here..obama and the news outlets tell us the unemployment rate has never been lower...??”

That’s right!

This author is obviously an ignoramus, unemployment is UNDER 5%!!!


13 posted on 10/22/2016 6:40:15 AM PDT by JPJones (George Washington's Tariffs were Patriotic. Build a Wall and Build a Wall of tariffs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Eight years of this. Be prepared if the Clinton wins. The separation of races under Obama’s watch will be minimal to what will happen to gender relations under Clinton’s presidency. The attacks will be coming at every angle. I wouldn’t be shocked if Clinton has a male-only military draft during her presidency when women are holding an
overwhelming amount of jobs in the workforce while young men are collecting handouts.


14 posted on 10/22/2016 6:47:56 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement ("World Peace 1.20.09.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Wrong!!!!

He is not accosting a passer-by and demanding to know why his head hearts. He is screaming that the passer-by caused his head to hurt and wants him to pay for the medical bill to heal it.


15 posted on 10/22/2016 6:49:22 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Why the surprise?

I mean they’re wife beating, smallpox blanket Distributing, cultural appropriating, would-be rapists, right?

all the women, aspiring hip hop artists and gay guys can work, I’m sure that plan will work out great.

good luck in the war, by the way.


16 posted on 10/22/2016 6:50:11 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Purposefully cross pollinating from another thread but, rational people with the option to lead productive lives, will choose to do so over a hamster wheel life of addiction. So it should not be surprising that opiate addiction is a problem where there is little hope in the economy. Hillary’s plan to eat the rich is only going to make things worse. The best part of Trump’s promise is giving people a productive option for their lives, most rational people will chose it.


17 posted on 10/22/2016 6:52:37 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPJones

LOL. That worked so well for the Rusian Tsar.


18 posted on 10/22/2016 6:53:37 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Who is John Galt?


19 posted on 10/22/2016 6:55:19 AM PDT by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy
Not an uncommon occurrence among village idiots, but not applicable in this case. Here, the author puzzles over the decay of moral structures that used to impel men to honorable labor, while readily admitting she wants to see Hillary Clinton in the White House. The same Hillary Clinton who is the very embodiment of the anti-male erosion she laments!

The author isn't trying to implement any new draconian programs to force men back to work; she honestly seems to be oblivious to the fact that she, people like her, and her chosen candidate are the very creators of the disaster she bemoans.

Maybe it's more like a guy wandering around with his eyes closed, running into doors, and when he asks the passer-by why his head hurts, the passer-by tells him to open his freakin' eyes!

20 posted on 10/22/2016 6:57:38 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson