All this is what I’ve read/heard about arguments lawyers have used to get their client judged not guilty. Look at what that Texas lawyer used on the kid who while drunk killed four people - used the affluence argument; kid was sent home. I just wouldn’t put it past a creep lawyer to try to point the blame elsewhere.
I see what you are saying. I do remember what Hillary clinton did.
Yes I do think that woman was a piss poor character for letting a man who had a criminal record near her baby. Still if I were on the jury it is not a reason for him to harm the child. No lawyer would be able to sway me. If people in this country are swayed by this then there is something wrong with them. I would as a jury member and a regular citizen give that mother a what for. She should have had better sense. What difference does it make? There are thousands more like her out there. Young, stupid and having babies with no father around to protect the child.