Posted on 10/02/2016 10:45:18 AM PDT by Be Careful
we could find out shillary paid money directly to ISIS and it wouldn’t matter. The MSM would ignore or turn the story into how it was leaked rather than the substance of it. Fox would talk about the story but make sure they always had a democrat or hillary campaign hack on set to counter the charges so they can be “fair and balanced”. All the usual bullshit.
We now know even the FBI is tainted. It really boils down to what it always has. The voters must speak, and speak loud enough to negate whatever fraud the DNC will instigate.
Don’t depend on october surprises or hillary health collapses....JUST FCKING VOTE.
You don’t want to make a deal with the devil, because the devil always lies.
A Whistleblower usually has one brightly shining moment; Such as the reporters who exposed Watergate, or James O’Keefe who exposed Acorn. Most proceeding exposes never do match the intensity of that first one. Assange may never match the red-hot infamy he received when the world first found out about Wiki-Leaks.
Of course a lot has to do with the media and whether or not they will keep the new ‘data dump’ in the news cycle.
Are you serious ..?? I never saw any info about that ..????
This thread is silly. No facts. Just theatrics, conspiracy theories, conjecture, innuendo and hoopla. Everyone’s an expert, so it seems.
Is it possible the Embassy cancelled the “balcony” announcement .. to protect their Embassy ..???
I don’t know why the balcony scene was needed anyway - it’s not like he was getting married.
Aussangius omnium cognoscet. Non in balconia, sed foro publico dicet.
Roger Stone going live @ 4pm Central. No backtracking from him:
https://mobile.twitter.com/RealAlexJones
Is that true? I have not heard about that.
Wasn’t one of his sources the young guy from DC who worked for the DNC?
“...it’s safest to just dump it without warning.”
Agreed. Julian has obviously not learned the first rule on ratting out the Clintons:
If they know you’ve got the goods on them, and you publicly threaten to expose them, you will likely depart this earth at an unscheduled time, place, and manner.
I cannot believe people were shocked and it influenced their vote, that few years ago, OVER A CANDIDATE’S YOUTHFUL DUI after he had stopped drinking many years ago.
I remember my grandmother changing her vote during the Clinton days away from a R candidate who was thought to also have had an affair.
Man were we innocent back then!!
I’ve been saying this was plan all along. Slowly release the information...they hand out immunity. And hillary skates. She didn’t go to jail,right? She is running for President?
Yet another case of ‘laws/rules are for little people’
My worry is Assange may be using the documentation I believe he has in order to broker a deal to get out of the Ecuadorean Embassy and back to Australia and his home turf. Whomever makes the best promise to achieve that may get to call the shots.
Agreed. Different times, different standards I guess.
You should watch it and let us know what you learn. I would do it myself but I need to give my Rams some help with Larry Fitzgerald.
If his purpose is to stop Hillary, I think the timing would depend on the magnitude, complexity, and nature of evidence. Something like the DUI for Bush did not have much magnitude...after a couple weeks any importance it had in people’s minds would fade. If the story is more profound and damaging it can released earlier. If the evidence is complex to sift through then it may need to be released earlier to give people time to connect dots.
On the other thread I posted that Assage is still going to make whatever announcement he planned to make but no public appearance on balcony.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3475939/posts?page=24#24
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.