Ignoring this issue or assuming 'Trump will fix it' -- either is a fig leaf for the globalists.
[Even if we fail to score, why not pick up some yards?]
The United States built it, and Obama wants to give it over to the U.N. where they can tax, regulate and censor it.
No one is complaining about it. So why fix something that is not broken?
Basics for Understanding Obama’s Internet Giveaway
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3464721/posts
— and listing/linking the senators and news sources sounding the horn.
~~~
ICANN Transition Even Endangers ‘.gov’ and ‘.mil’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3469586/posts
http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/09-14-16-rosenzweig-testimony.
ICANN transition insider Paul Rosenweig warns:
1. Foreign powers will “indisputably have increased influence”.
2. Transition a “leap in the dark”.
3. ICANN planning to move overseas.
4. ‘.gov’ and ‘.mil’ “not assured by any enforeable mechanism”.
~~~
Europe is seeking to form of ‘internet ostracism’ to regulate all domain names [aka web addresses] throughout the world, and Obama is on board.
Research here including followup posts ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3394704/posts
~~~
Senator Grassley in ICANN Hearing [internet giveaway]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3469467/posts
— “Unconstitutional”
— His concerns concur with Paul Rosenweig’s
~~~
Open Letter of Concern by Senators Cruz, Lankford, and Lee
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3463938/posts?page=113#113
[ICANN is stalling on specifics and holding secret talks with China.]
Open Letter by 25 advocacy groups incl. ‘Americans for Tax Reform’
http://docs.techfreedom.org/Coalition_Letter_IANA_8.10.16.pdf
2. It is important to point out that over thirty republicans in the senate oppose the globalization. Let’s not stab our friends in the back and make it clear that it’s only the career politicians of the GOP who support this monstrosity.
—————————————\
Where can we find a listing of who is wearing the white hats?