Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why is NAMBLA allowed to exist???
http://nambla.org/whatis.html ^ | TODAY | ME

Posted on 09/14/2016 8:37:18 AM PDT by Paul46360

Man/Boy Love: Propaganda versus reality

To explain man/boy love today, one must first explain what it is not: It is not what you view on television or read in newspapers. It’s not what you hear on Oprah or Geraldo, nor is it the propaganda put out by police and politicians.

It’s the love of a man for a boy, and of a boy for a man. Enjoyable, consensual, beautiful.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; Miscellaneous; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; love; manboy; nambla; pansexuals; pedophiles; perverts; sick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Paul46360

Free speech.

People are allowed to advocate for changing and even breaking the law, as long as the effect isn’t too immediate, ie sedition and incitement to riot.

The courts’ view of speech is pretty much free of moral content.

If you look at social instead of legal opposition, NAMBLA still is a love that dares not speak its name. Its advocates hide on the internet and even anything-goes gay pride marches bar it now. Bad for the image.


21 posted on 09/14/2016 9:37:07 AM PDT by heartwood (If you're looking for a </sarc tag>, you just saw it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion
I first heard about NAMBLA was from that South Park Episode.

I first heard about it when I heard that the celebrated overrated Beat poet Allen Ginsburg was an enthusiastic member. When criticized over it, Ginsburg retorted - "child rape? What about Rush Limbaugh? He commits mind rape!"

22 posted on 09/14/2016 9:40:20 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ("Political Correctness is communist propaganda writ small" - Theodore Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360
>>WTF???

EHRLICHMAN: Hot Pants!...

...It's fatal liberality.

http://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Ehrlichman+Hot+Pants


 

23 posted on 09/14/2016 9:48:36 AM PDT by HLPhat (It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

Find their membership list and begin the executions immediately..


24 posted on 09/14/2016 10:07:26 AM PDT by DickBrannigan (When did logic become reversed, and right became wrong, and wrong became right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

NAMBLA is allowed to exist because influential people in our country support and participate in the concept. They also make money from it. Read The Franklin Scandal by John DeCamp.
Evidence of a corrupt FBI is also found while reading the book.


25 posted on 09/14/2016 10:13:56 AM PDT by texteacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

No wonder speech is free. So little of it is worth anything.


26 posted on 09/14/2016 10:35:27 AM PDT by liberalism is suicide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

You are so right.


27 posted on 09/14/2016 10:38:17 AM PDT by liberalism is suicide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

Very good question! Shut it down.


28 posted on 09/14/2016 11:00:31 AM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

Very good question! Shut it down.


29 posted on 09/14/2016 11:00:31 AM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texteacher

>>Read The Franklin Scandal by John DeCamp.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Who+Toook+Johnny

Interesting new light shed when America’s Most Wanted accompanies Paul Bonacci to a house in Colorado.

Who was the prison guard that owned it... and disappeared?


30 posted on 09/14/2016 11:26:56 AM PDT by HLPhat (It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Could be. Just remember to ask though “Who gets to determine what speech is allowed?”

IMO we have to put up with some pretty vile ‘speech’ in order not to descend into a totalitarian Stalin-esque, Stasi state where only the elite, or the mob with the most military control gets to determine what can be said, written etc.

In the case of NAMBLA, I see it as a good thing that these people basically ‘out’ themselves so they can be watched to see if they act on their vile beliefs. It’s better to know what people are thinking/saying.


31 posted on 09/14/2016 11:53:45 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DickBrannigan

Be careful what you wish for.

We don’t execute people here for thought crimes ... no matter how vile. That could easily change and you could easily find yourself on the receiving end of mob justice.


32 posted on 09/14/2016 11:55:26 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
...I see it as a good thing that these people basically ‘out’ themselves so they can be watched to see if they act on their vile beliefs.

What if they deem their acting it out as "speech?" After all, the Occuparasites and BlackLiesMatter reprobates claim this "right" with their lawbreaking.

33 posted on 09/14/2016 11:56:29 AM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Committing a crime is not “speech”. Molesting minors is a crime.

If the wanted to make a case that it was “speech” they would have to take it to court, probably all the way to the SC and I’m pretty sure they would lose.

For example, you can talk about murder in general, how you’d like to murder (not a specific person but you just want to do it). You could even start up an organization of people who would like to murder people, or talk about murder in general, ways to do it etc. But if you ACT on it, then you’ve committed a crime and can be arrested and hopefully put away for life.


34 posted on 09/14/2016 12:12:08 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360
Because for progressives; “Their strength is their perversity”.
35 posted on 09/14/2016 12:12:29 PM PDT by yuleeyahoo (Those are my principles, and if you do not like them...well I have others. - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20

That was Obama’s safe schools (ha!) czar, Kevin Jennings. Got fired after a public school teach-in, where he was recorded telling a 14 yr old boy that picking up johns (prostitution) at the bus station was ok, as long as he used a condom.
His firing was a CYA move by Obama, only because Jennings got caught.

Kevin not to be confused with Ken Jennings, Jeopardy champ.


36 posted on 09/14/2016 12:19:35 PM PDT by mumblypeg (Forget Burning Man. Go to Man Hung On A Cross. (h/t to: HighTech Redneck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rinnwald
Pardon me if I don’t click on the link.

Wise decision, lest someone read your history and decide that you are one of THEM!

37 posted on 09/14/2016 12:19:44 PM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20; Paul46360

Lumper, See Paul’s home page.
He posted it for informational purposes, not expressing support.
IOW, know the enemy in order to defend yourself, your kids, and your country.
NAMBLA has been around for decades, but they’re “coming out of the closet” in a big way now, by publishing editorials like this, although the writer still prefers to remain anonymous.
“ME” is the anonymous writer of the article, not the FReeper Paul46360 who posted it. (That confused me at first glance, too.)
Hope this helps.


38 posted on 09/14/2016 12:34:41 PM PDT by mumblypeg (Forget Burning Man. Go to Man Hung On A Cross. (h/t to: HighTech Redneck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

Will Hillary condemn them as “Deplorable?” I’ll wager dollars to donuts they support her over Trump


39 posted on 09/14/2016 12:58:28 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Hillary Clinton, the elderly woman's version of "I dindu nuffins.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

Will Hillary condemn them as “Deplorable?” I’ll wager dollars to donuts they support her over Trump


40 posted on 09/14/2016 12:58:28 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Hillary Clinton, the elderly woman's version of "I dindu nuffins.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson