Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman
If the expansion is accelerating, it simply cannot be dismissed as an after-effect of the big bang, or the expansion would be either stable or decelerating. Acceleration means some undescribed force is currently driving it.

The nature of space-time is apparently such that it need not necessarily follow the ordinary laws of physics. ie, galaxies can and do expand away from each other faster than light speed. This is so because the galaxies are not actually moving through space but rather that the space between them is growing larger. The 'dimensionality', or 'measuring stick', is increasing in magnitude.

85 posted on 08/25/2016 12:43:43 PM PDT by ETL (God PLEASE help America...ASAP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: ETL

Well, what you talk about doesn’t actually violate relativity, since you are dealing with different reference frames, such as the old thought experiment with two ships leaving earth in opposite directions, each traveling 0.9c. If you imagine a stationary observer with a universal reference frame, it seems to violate relativity, but there is no universal reference frame in relativity, so it’s just an illusion of a violation.

On the other hand, acceleration requiring a force isn’t a principle that varies with reference frames or depends on relativity. It’s simply basic mechanics. Something is accelerating the matter in the universe, and it doesn’t matter how that acceleration is transmitted, through the expansion of space or otherwise, it still requires a force.


88 posted on 08/25/2016 12:54:20 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson