[Enlightened1]

When your debate opponents who cannot debate facts, logic, critical thinking, etc... then they say "conspiracy theory" or "conspiracy theorist" as a psychological operation to attack the messenger.

It's designed to distract the public and move the direction of the debate away from questioning the narrative.

[Menehune56]

Interesting that this CIA attack came about as a program for silencing the critics of the Warren Commission that ascribed the JFK assassination to a lone nut subsequently offed by another lone nut. The methods for countering opponents of the government line seem to be in use to this day on critics of obvious coverups like the TWA 800 center fuel tank explosion and Obama’s eligibility.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Dollars to doughnuts they created it to smear the John Birch Society.

What happened to the JBS was classic Alinsky Rule #5.

The real irony is that everything the JBS was saying back in the ‘60s has come to pass.

To this day people who should know better scoff when you mention their name.

[1rudeboy]

Sometimes a conspiracy theory is just that . . . witness our own Sandy Hook nuts, for example. Debate them? Fat chance.

[gigster]

Does this story include and mention a certain person who famously referred to a specific "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy"?

[Larry Lucido]

They wrote a dispatch in 1967 in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Times in 1976.

Okay, zerosenseblog.com

[discostu]

So wait, now there’s a conspiracy theory about where the phrase “conspiracy theory”?! Very meta.

Meanwhile most conspiracy theories desperately fail Occam’s razor.

[uncitizen]

Today they’ve created the new term “Liberal World Order” to confuse LIVS and RAT voters (but I repeat myself). They’ll hear “New World Order” and think “Liberal World Order”. And they’ll think the New World Order is a good thing for liberals.