If it is Russia, which it's probably not, nobody knows who it is, but if it is Russia, It's really bad for a different reason. Because it shows how little respect they have for our country when they would hack into a major party and get everything.
But it would be interesting to see, I will tell you this, Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press. Let's see if that happens, that will be next.
A.) He didn't call on them to hack anyone. He was commenting from the perspective that they had already hacked Hillary Clinton's unsecured server and had in their possession the 33,000 emails that were so potentially damaging that Hillary Clinton would go so far as to commit a felony to remove them from the national debate.
B.) If Russia does have these emails, it would most definitely be in America's best interest to see them released before Hillary Clinton weasels her way into the White House where those emails will become leverage against her.
If Russia has them, there's no way they will release them. They will wait to see if Hillary wins and use them against her. Hillary has been compromised and can be blackmailed. Guaranteed.
C.) It is also highly probable that whatever is in those emails implicates Barack Obama in impeachable offenses and would, therefore, also be useful leverage against him.
I don’t understand why liberals are so upset. Hillary said there was nothing top secret in the emails. They’re just about baby showers and family and friends stuff, right?
Trump is playing this media like they have never been played before!!! LOL They don’t even get it that he was calling out Hillary on the missing emails.
Oh who cares? Don't "enter their frame" by "defending" it. Anyone who doesn't have a stick up their ass can see it's the FUNNIEST DAMN THING IN A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN EVER!!
MIRTH my friends. MIRTH.
So...he wants Russia to hack the State Department? Again?
Hey there is nothing in those emails except yoga lessons and emails about the baby right Hillary..if there is nothing classified in those emails what’s the big deal let’s see them
What it means is that it will be a huge embarrassment for Hillary and maybe even Comey and I am okay with that because we need a good vetting of the process. A little Spring cleaning is in order for our Republic to survive.
MSM is having a butthurt rage over this. Trump again throws a grenade out for them to jump on. They dutifully jump on it & make themselves look insane & Trump comes out further ahead then before he threw it.
Vote Trump 2016
Did he tell Putin that he could be more flexible after the election in a hot mic moment.
Oh wait that was Obama.
Mrs. Clinton's misused equipment, the last we knew, was hardly still on line. I believe that it was in a disassembled condition in an FBI crime lab. No one is going to be hacking it.
The issue, is whether the American people are going to be privileged to know, what foreign governments may already know about the illegal behavior of our former Secretary of State--the woman who was largely indifferent to the security of Americans serving their Government in Benghazi.
Once again, the New York Times demonstrates the two standout traits of its present character. It is completely biased, and largely incompetent. Not a good recommendation.
Are the Dems concerned that someone else has her emails?
As the President of the Urban Poverty Law Center I am authorized to offer a reward of $1,000,000 for the release of the 30,000 missing emails.
Comey and Lynch will probably investigate and charge Trump for advocating Russian espionage.
Hilarious they don’t see what they are doing by repeating Trump’s jibe.
Someone needs to find them because our feds can’t or won’t.
ROTFLMAO
Yeah, I agree with your review of this. Isn’t it ironic though that we may have to depend on the former USSR to do justice? What happen to the US.....
(Oh wait.... 8 years of idiocy, etc)
TREATY WITH RUSSIA ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
__________
MESSAGE
from
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
transmitting
TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS, SIGNED AT WASHINGTON ON
JUNE 17, 1999, AND A RELATED EXCHANGE OF NOTES
February 10, 2000.—Treaty was read the first time, and together with
the accompanying papers, referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
and ordered to be printed for the use of the Senate
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
79-118 WASHINGTON : 2000
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
The White House, February 10, 2000.
To the Senate of the United States:
With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the
Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Treaty Between
the United States of America and the Russian Federation on
Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters, signed at Moscow
on June 17, 1999. I transmit also, for the information of the
Senate, a related exchange of notes and the report of the
Department of State with respect to the Treaty.
The Treaty is one of the series of modern mutual legal
assistance treaties being negotiated by the United States in
order to counter criminal activities more effectively. The
Treaty should be an effective tool to assist in the prosecution
of a wide variety of crimes, including terrorism, money
laundering, organized crime and drug-trafficking offenses. The
Treaty is self-executing.
The Treaty provides for a broad range of cooperation in
criminal matters. Mutual assistance available under the Treaty
includes obtaining the testimony or statements of persons;
providing documents, records and other items; serving
documents; locating or identifying persons and items; executing
requests for searches and seizures; transferring persons in
custody for testimony or other purposes; locating and
immobilizing assets for purposes of forfeiture, restitution, or
collection of fines; and any other form of legal assistance not
prohibited by the laws of the Requested Party.
I recommend that the Senate give early and favorable
consideration to the Treaty and give its advice and consent to
ratification.
William J. Clinton.