Posted on 07/22/2016 6:21:51 AM PDT by orchestra
CNN REPORTER AMBUSHES BLACK TRUMP SUPPORTER— GETS SCHOOLED!
A CNN reporter ambushed black Trump supporter “Kenneth” outside the RNC in Cleveland. The CNN crank accused Trump of racism because some white supremacists who he disavowed support him.
Kenneth let him have it!
Kenneth the Trump supporter: I’m out here making sure I express my support for Mr. Donald J. Trump. And I’m fighting back against people like Black Lives Matter which CNN supports along with the Hillary Clinton foundation and Bill Clinton foundation, the traitors to this country.
CNN reporter: What do you think of the fact that the white supremacists support Trump?
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Ahhh, nothing better than watching a liberal get a delicious cup of STFU in the morning. Thanks for posting.
Now I see the PHD in common sense. CNN oooouch
Me like!
I shouldn’t be shocked but still am at CNN throwing away all pretense of non bias last night. They have literally been losing their minds over the speech. Dark, gloomy, worst speech ever, there aren’t enough white guys to get him elected. Trying to make the case that only the people in the room think anything is wrong with our country.
Denial and deception is powerful. I want someone to ask them, if the majority of Americans don’t think things are bad, then why did Hillary almost lose to Bernie? In a fair contest, she would have lost. It’s because the Bernie supporters are unhappy with the current state of things as well. Also, they are a bunch of snowflakes who want more free stuff. :)
EPIC!!See the ends of his mouth curl downwards. He was about to cry and ended up running away to a safe space.
Handled absolutely correctly and perfectly. When a question gets asked that has an insinuation as an undertone (especially racism), just flip the question back to the reporter. Seeing the smug reporter’s look disappear as they repeated “Do Black Panthers support Obama”?.... and then see him slink away muttering “hey, I’m just doing my job...” says it all and was more than worth the price of admission. What an epic failure on CNN’s part.... they thought they could put out a question that would cause an internal conundrum for a black man and they got exposed and called on it big time. Just being a reporter and doing one’s job? I hardly think so.... this was a classic exposure of CNN pushing the CNN (Clinton News Network) agenda. The only thing that would have made this better is if the black gentleman would have also added “does the terrorist organization black olives matter support Obama? And does Obama support them?”
The classic 'gotcha' antagonism question from the koolaid-drunk CNN (Clinton News Network) rep, the equivalent of "have you stopped beating your wife?" Any support from any far-right group (note: no names and no counts for 'white supremacists') means that any Republican Candidate must immediately disavow and humbly beg the public's forgiveness. The left will then immediately demand reparations and resignation followed by self-immolation!
As for parity on the left? Who would dare ask?
Fabulous!
Poor little sissy CNN trendy—got schooled. Where’s his safe space?
Where’s his safe space
CNN coffee room brewing a pot of decaf.
That was great!!!
The little Marxist-in-training got schlonged.
Lol! A new CNN docu drama: A beatch and his coffee
I couldn’t agree more…. Shocking how instantaneous it was. Up to the end of Trump’s speech, CNN’s coverage was hopelessly biased for the past 4 days but that was expected given that the panels were always way more weighted toward the Democrats. Some of the Democratic Party shills were hard to stomach but at least it was useful to watch to better understand how they intend to attack Trump in the coming months…. I would put the comments of Axelrod in that category. As for the Republicans, I thought (speaking of CNN) that both Lord and Lewandowski did a fairly good job. However, here is what I noticed….. within seconds of Trump switching off his mic last night, the words “dark, gloomy, vision of a Mad Max world” etc. started pouring out of the shills. Switch the channel and it was the exact same words…. For a while it seemed like the only word allowed to describe Trump’s speech on ALL channels was “dark”. I would be sooo curious to know who issued the talking points to all of these folks at the same instantaneous moment with the statement at the top “the word to describe the speech is dark. Make sure you include that word in every statement.” When I ask “who issued the talking points, I’m not just talking organization… who was the specific individual?
The bottom line is that the only shocking thing is how complete the lack of pretense is now....
There really is no need to guess. One can assume that the Democratic Party sent out its collective talking points for the speech. These were simply regurgitated and tweaked by each in the Press. Indeed, the collective use of the same theme across several networks would indicate the conspiracy has no pretence to cloak anymore. It is open and brazen.They are the enemy of the people.
The talking point should backfire on them and I agree, it was a lame punk journolist dope who came up with the idiot ‘dark’ nonsense.
Reagan’s 1980 acceptance speech was dark! Look how THAT turned out! Luckily people still migrate to truth, so the lame talking point will fail.
Brethern come in all colors and types!
Now that is diverse....excellent.
Dark, gloomy, worst speech ever.....
First news story on my radio today. I KNEW it was biased!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.