Posted on 07/18/2016 6:13:39 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever
In the decades prior to the Revolutionary War, tensions arose between the two largest global powers: BRITAIN, led by King George II, and FRANCE, led by King Louis XV.
Because of their alliances with other nations, fighting escalated into the first global war - the Seven Years War, or as it was called in America, the French and Indian War.
The conflict included every major power in Europe as well as their colonies from the Caribbean, to India, to the Philippines, and to Africa.
Over a million died.
(Excerpt) Read more at campaign.r20.constantcontact.com ...
Just as the Bush and Obama are responsive to the moneyed interests who profit from unrestrained immigration, so the corrupt British Parliament of the 18th century was responsive to the real source of wealth for England at the time, the sugar plantations of the Caribbean.
The parliament's remedy for the terror or guerrilla war along the frontier was to deny the yeomanry access to the frontier and so they attempted to close the frontier to pioneer expansion. By parallel analogy, the establishment in Washington does not seek to cure the cause of terrorist attacks in America by shutting down unrestrained immigration. In each case the ruling powers turn their face from the needs of the middle class to favor the elite.
My ancestor’s nephew (his brothers son), John Finley was at that battle. Washington was his commander.
Yep. That’s another parallel.
“The parliament’s remedy for the terror or guerrilla war along the frontier was to deny the yeomanry access to the frontier”
I was just reading about that in Ray Raphael’s “Founders”. It was one of the many aggravations following the French and Indian War that stuck in the craw of Colonials and unified them against London. It affected George Washington directly.
William Johnson was the general over the colonials..
When the British won the French and Indian War (the Seven Years War here in Europe) their aim was to get the sugar islands which they regarded to be a far more value than the rough and untamed land which produced border wars and a few furs in the peace negotiation which followed.
I think one of the reasons why capitalism flourished in America when Europe experienced the French Revolution, the revolutions of 1848, the Russian Revolution and the post-World War I communist revolutions in places like Hungary and Germany, was because the continent lacked the safety valve of the frontier. That frontier meant that labor was very valuable and scarce and it meant that the American economy would flourish as a merit based economy.
It might contribute to the fact that the American Revolution was not a precursor of the excesses of the French Revolution and it might even be an explanation why Britain managed to escape the horrors of the French Revolution and the subsequent revolutions in 19th century on the European continent. The British Empire had a frontier in the sense that they had a colonial empire and most of the European nations did not. Even France could not boast of the same safety valve.
Actually, now that I have retread the battle, Dunbar was his commander as he was a wagoner in the supply train.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.