Posted on 07/02/2016 2:02:58 PM PDT by affan76
Remember when the Republican senators visited President Nixon to tell him "it's over" you lost Senate support. It is not the "shiny object" of the fact there was a unscripted meeting between the Attorney General and wjc, it is likely the message delivered to him followed by what has been said and done: the Attorney General, in so many words, saying she will accept the FBI recommendation and today, the FBI briefing HRC of their intentions. The trigger to me is the leak of a potential charge of violation of the Espionage Act.
I use Occam’s Razor to explain the “when life begins” debate. Besides religious and other reasons, it seems the simplest answer is at conception.
Or a sport model:
There will be no indictment. Its obvious. Why do people still kid themselves?
Has it ever occurred to you that every time someone says that, it reinforces the very outcome were resisting?
__________________
“Reinforces” with who? Loretta Lynch? Look, the matter will not be decided by what is said on FR. But if you want to take that tack, my view would be that every time someone predicts an indictment, that reinforces the notion that somehow Lynch and the others will follow the law, and behave honorably. Ain’t so.
ROFL, is that a picture of your blog police uniform?
Shut up blowing off about being “geriatric”. IF you can
walk; get up and walk. Do what you can. Don’t get hit by
a bus. I’m 70 this month. So don’t murmur. You have to
keep on keeping on as long as you’re in this derned Mortal
Coil. And vote! Kill a Hitler-y vote!
There are no honorable DemonRats in DC haven’t been in years . The end.
It was a joke..
“...the matter will not be decided by what is said on FR.”
Reality is created by agreement. If enough people agree that a thing is so, that thing will manifest itself.
It’s not just Freepers creating agreement that Hillary will skate. I see people expressing that negative view wherever comments appear on the internet.
Ask yourself. How can Hillary be made to pay the price for her crimes, when the prevailing view is that she won’t be made to pay?
Your view of reality as “created by agreement” is not mine. Sorry, I’ll just have to call it like I see it, not how I’d like it to be.
“Your view of reality as created by agreement is not mine.”
That’s cool, but consider this: in an election, the candidate who draws the greatest amount of agreement amongst the voters, wins. Group agreement put that candidate in office, and thus created a new reality.
Another example: A production company puts out a film that becomes a blockbuster hit because so many moviegoers agree that it’s immensely entertaining. Group agreement created the reality that that film is a hit.
One more: Media and Academia collude to dumb down the population, and carefully indoctrinates them with a worldview that runs counter to the founding precepts of their nation, and the very roots of their ancient culture. Over time, the aggregate agreement of these dumbed down people results in a very real undermining of the foundational institutions and cultural norms which once supported and gave strength to that nation and its people. A new reality gradually supplants the old reality, because group agreement now says it shall.
I guarantee you, if the vast majority of Americans (both inside and outside of government) agreed that Hillary Clinton would face sure justice for the crimes she’s guilty of, she wouldn’t have a hope of walking away from this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.