Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supervolcanoes like Yellowstone may have been more active in the past
National Science Foundation ^ | 6/2/2016 | Carol Frost, Davin Bagdonas

Posted on 06/04/2016 11:13:08 AM PDT by JimSEA

Magma located under areas that include the Yellowstone region and the western margin of North and South America can erupt violently, spewing vast quantities of ash into the air, followed by slower flows of glassy, viscous magma.

[A] new study by University of Wyoming researchers suggests scientists can go back to the past to study present-day solidified magma chambers where the erosion has removed overlying rock, exposing granite underpinnings.

One such large granite body, the 2.62 billion-year-old Wyoming batholith, extends more than 125 miles across central Wyoming.

University of Wyoming earth scientist Davin Bagdonas traversed the Granite, Shirley and Laramie Mountains to examine the batholith. He found remarkable uniformity, with similar minerals throughout.

Says Bagdonas, who worked on the project with Frost, "only minor variations were observed in granite near the roof and margins."

That homogeneity, or sameness, indicates the crystallizing magma was well-mixed. However, more subtle variations across the batholith show that the magma formed by the melting of multiple rock sources that rose through several conduits.

Large bodies composed of biotite granite, such as the Wyoming batholith, are more common in the Neoarchean era (2.8 billion-2.5 billion years ago) than in younger terrains. The reason may relate to higher radioactive heat production in the past, which provided power to drive extensive granite formation.

"If these ancient rocks are analogs for the magma systems underlying modern supervolcanoes, then explosive volcanism may have been far more abundant in Earth's past than it is today," the researchers conclude in their paper.


TOPICS: Outdoors; Science
KEYWORDS: deeptime; geology; supervolcanoe; volcanos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: JimSEA

Fascinating!!!


21 posted on 06/04/2016 4:05:15 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Yeah, it would be very cool go and see all that first hand... Very cool indeed!

If I am remembering right, I think that they believe that those kimberlites are from the middle to lower mantle, not the core area. And they wouldn’t be from before the core was formed, as it was formed 30-50 million years after the formation of the solar system/earth, predating the oldest rocks and these rocks in particular by many millions to billions of years. The ages of emplacement of the south african kimberlites is approximately 120 million years BP and the australian ones 1.2 billion years BP.


22 posted on 06/04/2016 4:51:51 PM PDT by LaRueLaDue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

23 posted on 06/04/2016 5:01:32 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson