Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pepsionice

If it were my call, I would never eliminate a baby born to military overseas from running. However, why did congress pass a resolution? Is it the USSC’s role to interpret the constitution?


17 posted on 04/08/2016 12:21:34 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: morphing libertarian

For some odd reason, this whole topic keeps coming up about every five to ten years. People seem to just not grasp that several thousand Americans now (used to be alot more) are born via military parents at overseas locations. Everyone seems to want to reinvent the discussion and carry it to some other level....when there’s just not much to talk about.


20 posted on 04/08/2016 12:26:41 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian
Is it the USSC’s role to interpret the constitution?

I dunno.

I checked Article III - not there.

If you find something in the Constitution about the USSC "interpreting" it, let me know.

73 posted on 04/08/2016 4:26:52 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown, are by desperate appliance relieved, or not at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson