I do have a background in those fields and the depth and reach of the author's intent is quite inaccurate -- he could have used different imagery to talk about the war against Islam -- it's like Charlemagne using MOhammad's army as justification for attacking the Saxons.
I am NOT the author yet I am posting this.
You should have been around when this piece was initially posted here on FR- no one had a problem with it at all.
Regardless of your “background” one would think your slinging arrows at a “poster” who hardly qualifies as the author could perchance make you think about your own completely unwritten educated reply. If you want to fight fire with fire then man up , give it a go & provide all the readers here your scholarly rebuttal. Don’t direct it to me either-if you were responsible for every mistake in any post you have posted here on FR from other sources you’d
be up in a shite pile wouldn’t you? and no shovel to boot.
Do you have a problem with history as how the author re-iterated? take it up with the author on Breitbart .
No one has forced you to read the link-act like a academic, man up & direct your comments to the author.