"Experts"
Posted on 03/12/2016 9:45:28 AM PST by Bob434
WASHINGTON Climate science has progressed so much that experts can accurately detect global warming’s fingerprints on certain extreme weather events, such as a heat wave, according to a high-level scientific advisory panel.
(Excerpt) Read more at poststar.com ...
How can scientists link an extreme weather event to just 0.00136% of the atmosphere? They haven't' even been able to explain how just 0.00136% of our atmosphere is capable of capturing and holding enough heat to warm the globe let alone linking such an insignificant amount of CO2 to extreme weather events!
Panel finds to keep the gravy train rolling they need to lie even more.
It’s magic
... except there’s been no global warming for what, close to two decades?
Can they detect this finger print?
It’s nice that the global warming “experts” can find these “climate fingerprints” in the weather’s “carbon footprints” but have any actual SCIENTISTS who are not funded by DemocRAT politicians ever found such “fingerprints”?
They just will not let go of man-made global warming, will they?? Well, when you have NOTHING, anything is fair game.
There used to be dinosaurs living in Antarctica.
no no no- they just cam out and declared there ‘really has been warming after all’ (of course to come to this LYING conclusion they had to fudge the satellite data to fit the agenda- claiming that the satellites have ‘drifted off course’ and therefore an adjustment was needed to compensate for the cooler readings they got- it never ends with these LIARS!- They are now crowing about this claiming ‘deniers can’t use the excuse that there’s been no warming for 2 decades any longer’- it’s like living in a freakin bizarro world now- lies are now the truth- truth is frowned upon)
Pure Bandini mountain.
It is one thing to make long-term average predictions, but to say that they have isolated a AGW/CC “fingerprint” in the non-linear, chaotic behavior of weather in their models (which do not include all the variables) defies logic.
Weather events that run counter to the latest proposed pattern for global warming are just random events and only idiot deniers would try to cite random events to counter settled science.
Translation:
Programmers have manipulated the software to extract DESIRED results from chaotic piles of numbers through differential elimination of everything that is detrimental to having the DESIRED results exist.
As a database manager for the records of a major FedGov site since 1991, this is how it has always been done to prove your budgetary requirements for next year. Everyone does it, always have, always will, nothing illegal or unethical about it. Not unethical because it is the process you are ORDERED to follow to compete evenly with everyone else also doing it. (Still is “doesn’t-feel-quite-right” slimy in my opinion).
[[Weather events that fit the latest proposed pattern are valid examples of the effects of global warming.]]
No doubt- but the fact is weather is warming- then it will cool again- there is NO link to man’s CO2 though, and it certainly can’t be linked to just 0.00136% of the atmosphere
To put htis in perspective- take a thimble full of 100 degree water, drop it into an olympic sized pool of 98 degree water- once a year- and then tell us the pool has ‘catastrophically warmed’ in the past decade due to thimbles of 100 degree water beign dumped in once a year-
That’s how freakin ridiculous the argument is that man is causing climate change- Our atmosphere does not have enough CO2 to do anything regarding changing the climate- nothing- there isn’t enough CO2 to do so- there is no ‘thick blanket of CO2 preventing heat from escaping the earth’- there simply is not enough of it to blanket the globe- let alone in a thick enough layer to cause warming
"Experts"
How do they separate ‘man made’ events from natural oscillations in climate that have always occurred, like the Ice Age, etc.? They always begin with the premise that, in nature, the climate is fixed and static.
[[It is one thing to make long-term average predictions, but to say that they have isolated a AGW/CC “fingerprint” in the non-linear, chaotic behavior of weather in their models (which do not include all the variables) defies logic.]]
Exactly-
[[How do they separate ‘man made’ events from natural oscillations in climate that have always occurred, like the Ice Age, etc.?]]
They are claiming the events have ‘accelerated’- with no proof that they actually have- their word is supposed to be good enough to ‘count as science’ I guess
So in other words,they’ve developed BSing into an art form.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.