[Bob434]

unbelievable! 'We can detect it because we say we can, and that settles it! Now that we have proclaimed this, anyone claiming we can't predict it should be prosecuted'- is essentially what this article alludes to now- They never do explain how they can find the 'fingerprints of man's production of CO2' in these extreme weather events- they just make the asinine claim and declare it to be truth that they can 'find fingerprints from man's production of CO2 which comprises just 0.00136% of the atmosphere (the atmosphere weighs nearly 6 QUADRILLION tons, it has just 0.04% CO2 in it due to both man and nature- of that 0.04% man is responsible for just 3.4% of that amount- meaning that the total CO2 in our atmosphere due to man is just 0.00136% of our atmosphere

How can scientists link an extreme weather event to just 0.00136% of the atmosphere? They haven't' even been able to explain how just 0.00136% of our atmosphere is capable of capturing and holding enough heat to warm the globe let alone linking such an insignificant amount of CO2 to extreme weather events!

[cp124]

Panel finds to keep the gravy train rolling they need to lie even more.

[Ophiucus]

It’s magic

[RegulatorCountry]

... except there’s been no global warming for what, close to two decades?

[FlingWingFlyer]

It’s nice that the global warming “experts” can find these “climate fingerprints” in the weather’s “carbon footprints” but have any actual SCIENTISTS who are not funded by DemocRAT politicians ever found such “fingerprints”?

[EagleUSA]

They just will not let go of man-made global warming, will they?? Well, when you have NOTHING, anything is fair game.

[barbarianbabs]

There used to be dinosaurs living in Antarctica.

[kosciusko51]

Pure Bandini mountain.

It is one thing to make long-term average predictions, but to say that they have isolated a AGW/CC “fingerprint” in the non-linear, chaotic behavior of weather in their models (which do not include all the variables) defies logic.

[dead]

Weather events that fit the latest proposed pattern are valid examples of the effects of global warming.

Weather events that run counter to the latest proposed pattern for global warming are just random events and only idiot deniers would try to cite random events to counter settled science.

[Navy Patriot]

...Climate science has progressed so much that experts can accurately detect global warming’s fingerprints on certain extreme weather events...

"Experts"

[Spok]

How do they separate ‘man made’ events from natural oscillations in climate that have always occurred, like the Ice Age, etc.? They always begin with the premise that, in nature, the climate is fixed and static.

[rockinqsranch]

How can "cattle graze on barren hillsides"? Anyone!?

[KarlInOhio]

Let's put it to a vote. All those in favor of the assumption that global warming exists and is man made please say "Aye" and pick up your research grants on the way out. Those opposed can pick up your indictments from the Department of Justice on your way to the paddy wagon.

[Farmer Dean]

So in other words,they’ve developed BSing into an art form.

[WKUHilltopper]

So...what happened to the Ice Age? Fred Flintstone’s SUV?

[cloudmountain]

How can scientists link an extreme weather event to just 0.00136% of the atmosphere? They haven't' even been able to explain how just 0.00136% of our atmosphere is capable of capturing and holding enough heat to warm the globe let alone linking such an insignificant amount of CO2 to extreme weather events!

It comes from human arrogance in thinking that we are so VERY important in the patterns of earthly weather.

[stocksthatgoup]

We can just make things up.

[Mike Darancette]

This ain’t science. “Goosed” is not a scientific term.