That's a very key phrase. How can he possibly conceive of the concept 'consent of the governed' when he consents to no one?
In my opinion, Trump will not try to govern; he will try to rule and I think it's a mistake to trade one 'ruler' for another.
NOT just one man’s opinion......(I agree wholeheartedly with your opinion)
...YOU are one of millions!!!!.....Praise be!
And I did vote wisely......early voting, just like Mr. T asked us to do at the rally!!
My day today consists of this morning phoning Republicans across the state of Florida for Mr. Trump
......next..... Around noon, observing as a poll watcher at one of our early voter venues
.....then late afternoon, standing on some corner in our little burg holding a Trump sign!!!!....A FUN DAY!
If Trump loses, our whole country loses. A real mover and shaker comes along so rarely. Reagan was the last one, and that was years ago. If we miss this opportunity with Trump, our country will suffer immensely. Depends whether the voters can withstand the media/RINO/Dem onslaught and remain loyal to Trump.
It’s in the voters’ hands; I just hope they realize that their choice will shape the type of America we have in the future, a socialist utopia of suffering for all or a renewal of the shining city on a hill. I hope they choose wisely.
There's equally a lot of reasons to vote for Trump ... and good ones at that, too.
For me, it's a matter of genesis.
Trump's filter has been, for 40 plus years, "How do I get things to work that makes (me) money?"
Many people are paying lip service to the "Make America Great Again" slogan because they have never experienced a great America before
I have
I have played hookey from high school, walked into a factory and started Monday on a part time or 2nd shift job .... which soon made me hate THAT kind of work .... so I played hookey again and on a Friday, had a job starting Monday.
THAT WAS A COMMON OCCURRENCE IN POST WW2 AMERICA
I personally believe Viet Nam was invented to get rid of us relatively educated, determined and beginning to understand wealth and how to get it ... blossoming political male minds .
We were a serious threat to the status quo, the machine, the man ... call it what you will ... we had to be dealt with and the best way to get rid of men is to kill them off .... and war is the more easily acceptable way
Until now.
Trump has an understanding (imo) of how things used to work, what happened to stop or make things difficult to work and what could/should/would (if he only had the power) to make them workagain
Selfish ?
Every ONE of us is selfish .... Those that will vote for Cruz say in their soul I want Cruz .... or I want Trump .... because
I think, want, believe (whatever)
Trump has my vote
Indeed, vote wisely! That means vote to win!
To win, our nominee MUST be constitutionally eligible to be POTUS, otherwise hidebeast, the RATS and the media WILL remove his name from the state ballots!
We all know illegal aliens, no matter how good they are, are still illegal! Until they go through the legal process to become legal US citizens, they cannot vote.
By the same token, people who are not article II natural born citizens are NOT constitutionally eligible, i.e. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio. Until the Constitution has been amended to allow people who are NOT nbc to be the president, non-nbc cannot compete in the presidential race!
You might insist that Cruz and/or Rubio are nbc(s), but hildebeats and the RATS and their ferocious media WILL insist they are not and they have the POWER to remove your Cruz or Rubio! You will not even have a chance to argue! The GOPe won’t lift a finger to help!
Here we are, the non-nbc, such as Cruz, Rubio, Jindal etc. are allowed to run and potentially take away the opportunities for the eligible candidates, AND, if nominated, most certainly WILL be removed by the hildebeast and her RATS and her media!
Unlike obola, we don’t have the luxury of media help, judicial help, big financiers help, or GOP’s help. We are bound to lose our Cruz of Rubio nominee. GOPe will nominate Bush who will lose to hidebeast!
Voting for non-nbc (Cruz or Rubio) is the sure way to lose!
You lost me right up front.
Marco Rubio is qualified? In what respect?
Marco Rubio is an empty suit in the mold of Obama. He is less than a one term U.S. Senator with nary an accomplishment to his credit. Matter-of-fact, I challenge you to name ONE!
One of the most hilarious moments in this whole Republican primary season came right after Rick Santorum came out and endorsed Marco Rubio. The very next morning, I believe it was Joe Scarborough who asked Santorum to name the accomplishments of Marco Rubio that have led you to endorse him? Santorum was literally speechless. And to his credit Scarborough would not let it go creating a very embarrassing situation for Santorum.
At that moment, I completely lost respect for Santorum. Why did he endorse Rubio? It certainly wasn't based on Rubio's accomplishments. So why did he endorse Rubio? The only answer I can come up with is that the RNC made a deal with Santorum for future considerations if he (Santorum) would endorse Rubio.
So Santorum is nothing more than an "insider" willing to sell his soul for a few pieces of silver down the pike. He certainly is NOT the Conservative icon that he purports himself to be.
It is “one man’s opinion”, yet you post vanities about it every day. Please tag your posts as vanity.
I remember when FR was a conservative site. Now it is a Trump pep rally, his conservatism of convenience be damned. He may win but he’s no conservative and I predict there’s going to be some highly disillusioned people here in about two years.