To: PIF
So, Obama never thought of this?
More likely, he rejected the very idea.
To: Pearls Before Swine
Not just likely, he openly rejected the idea over environmental concerns in addition to those of the people driving the vehicles as “innocents”.
3 posted on
03/06/2016 8:02:25 AM PST by
mazda77
To: Pearls Before Swine
“So, Obama never thought of this?..More likely, he rejected the very idea.”
The problem is that you then cut off the flow of money, which means that the terrorists cannot buy food, which then means that terrorist women and children go hungry, which is then a war crime (i.e., punishing women and children for the actions of a handful of bad men).
...this is EXACTLY how this bunch (i.e., all Democrats) see it, whether they admit it or not.
9 posted on
03/06/2016 8:13:24 AM PST by
BobL
(Who cares? He's going to build a wall and stop this invasion.)
To: Pearls Before Swine
So, Obama never thought of this?...More likely, he rejected the very idea. Yes, he rejected it a few months back because destroying the oil transports of ISIS would cause "environmental damage".
I'm not kidding.
12 posted on
03/06/2016 8:19:23 AM PST by
libertylover
(The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
To: Pearls Before Swine
Ever notice how small obama’s handds are
16 posted on
03/06/2016 8:39:29 AM PST by
shadeaud
(Be strong when you are weak and stand up for our Constitution.)
To: Pearls Before Swine
Ever notice how small obama’s handds are
17 posted on
03/06/2016 8:39:30 AM PST by
shadeaud
(Be strong when you are weak and stand up for our Constitution.)
To: Pearls Before Swine
Ever notice how small obama’s handds are
18 posted on
03/06/2016 8:39:31 AM PST by
shadeaud
(Be strong when you are weak and stand up for our Constitution.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson