Not just likely, he openly rejected the idea over environmental concerns in addition to those of the people driving the vehicles as “innocents”.
Those were the excuses given. I don’t believe they are the real reasons. He’s supporting them.
Ya, our military has been told to consider impacts to global warming and the environment, in our military operations.
God help us all. Could we have won World War II with some of the absurd constraints we place on our military nowadays??
What was the carbon footprint of the Normandy invasion?
Obama has sued every BS excuse in the book not to oppose ISIS including a desire to avoid civilian casualties and environmental concerns.
However, Obama bombed the heck out of Libya with no concerns what so ever for civilian casualties, collateral damage or damage to the environment or civilian infrastructure.
The big difference in Libya was that Obama was using American military attacks to support an ISIS takeover of Libya.
In Syria, Obama is protecting ISIS to allow ISIS to take over Syria