Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter Lays Out The White House Plan To Replace Hillary Clinton
CBS Philly ^ | 3-3-2016 | Chris Stigall

Posted on 03/05/2016 1:14:15 PM PST by Citizen Zed

Conservative author and columnist Ann Coulter laid out how she thinks the White House is planning to subvert Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, push Vice-President Joe Biden to the nomination and name Attorney General Loretta Lynch to the Supreme Court.

Coulter, during an interview with Chris Stigall on Talk Radio 1210 WPHT, said the process begins with charges emanating from the investigation into the former Secretary of State’s private email server.

“[James] Comey goes ahead, the FBI Director, because this egregious, indicts Hillary, but then this has to go to the Attorney General. Valerie Jarrett, who is very close to Obama, is chirping in his ear constantly, puts in a call to Lorretta Lynch, the Attorney General, and says disregard everything the President is about to say publicly. Obama comes out and says this is outrageous, Hillary did nothing wrong, there should be no indictment, but of course, the Attorney General is independent. Loretta Lynch goes ahead and indicts Hillary. It destroys Hillary’s campaign and gets Biden in and then it’s harder for the Republicans to say we refuse to put Loretta Lynch on the Supreme Court.”

(Excerpt) Read more at philadelphia.cbslocal.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: adiosamerica; anncoulter; coulter; hillary2016; lorettalynch; pages; scotusnominee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Trump's future chief of staff, Ann Coulter.
1 posted on 03/05/2016 1:14:15 PM PST by Citizen Zed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

More like White House spokesperson.


2 posted on 03/05/2016 1:19:20 PM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

I would tune in to every press conference I could.

That would be wonderful!


3 posted on 03/05/2016 1:20:27 PM PST by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

I hope Ann is wrong about Loretta Lynch. We sure as heck don’t want her on the Supreme Court.


4 posted on 03/05/2016 1:21:29 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Loretta Lynch = Femi-negro. Woman and black first, everyone else is meaningless.


5 posted on 03/05/2016 1:24:45 PM PST by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Sounds plausible, does Obama really want to risk exposing the outright hypocrisy of his entire reign of terror by protecting Hillary? Maybe if he liked her enough? Does he?


6 posted on 03/05/2016 1:25:37 PM PST by fireman15 (The USA will be toast if the Democrats are able to take the Presidency in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Agreed, although it’s probably worse than that. Obama probably wouldn’t have nominated her as AG unless she was a closet Marxist.


7 posted on 03/05/2016 1:28:14 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

I don’t follow her logic: “Biden [gets] in and then it’s harder for the Republicans to say we refuse to put Loretta Lynch on the Supreme Court.”

I guess “gets in” means Biden gets the nomination. How does that make it harder to for Republicans to refuse to put Lynch on SCOTUS?


8 posted on 03/05/2016 1:30:40 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Can’t a Supreme Court judge be impeached?


9 posted on 03/05/2016 1:33:12 PM PST by jmacusa ("Dats all I can stands 'cuz I can't stands no more!''-- Popeye The Sailorman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Yes


10 posted on 03/05/2016 1:36:00 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

I’ve been saying this for months. The hate between Obama and the Clintons is still strong. They do NOT want to to run that hag and Bernie’s a non-starter, so who else have they got? Plus if it’s Biden, the #NeverTrump gang will go over to him, too.


11 posted on 03/05/2016 1:37:21 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

I’m still not convinced an indictment would seal her fate. Bad things don’t happen to the Clintons.


12 posted on 03/05/2016 1:41:48 PM PST by Fair Paul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

It’s plausible, but what an opportunity for the Republicans to decline the overt bribe. To express gratitude for ridding us of Hilary the Harpy by rewarding Ms. Lynch would be the pinnacle of craven Republican behavior, which also wouldn’t suprise us.


13 posted on 03/05/2016 1:42:19 PM PST by Bill W was a conservative (Profile, detain, interrogate, deport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Maybe Ann is figuring the left will brow-beat the Repubs with: “well, she did indict Hillary; what more do you want”.


14 posted on 03/05/2016 1:49:10 PM PST by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

“It destroys Hillary’s campaign and gets Biden in and then it’s harder for the Republicans to say we refuse to put Loretta Lynch on the Supreme Court.”

How so? I mean, if they want to sandbag Hillary and put Joe in as the nominee, I’m fine with that, but it strikes me that if anything, that would make it easier to say “no” to Loretta Lynch. Why would we agree to give her a lifetime seat when we could very easily wait a few months, beat the clown and get a nominee more on our own terms?


15 posted on 03/05/2016 1:50:24 PM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2016: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Based on the precedent set by the democrats in declaring Thurgood Marshall’s the “Black seat”, Scalia can only be replaced by an Italian.

Putting a female black in an Italian seat is racist and xenophobic.


16 posted on 03/05/2016 1:54:15 PM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
I'm thinking a Biden/Warren liar. This will lock in all plagiarists and resume padders.
17 posted on 03/05/2016 2:03:22 PM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

That is my take on her meaning, but I don’t see that as being realistic.


18 posted on 03/05/2016 2:12:28 PM PST by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
If they were going to push Clinton out and run Biden, why didn't they do that at the start?
19 posted on 03/05/2016 2:16:24 PM PST by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRadtke

Why don’t you think it’s realistic ..??


20 posted on 03/05/2016 2:16:25 PM PST by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson