Posted on 03/05/2016 1:14:15 PM PST by Citizen Zed
Conservative author and columnist Ann Coulter laid out how she thinks the White House is planning to subvert Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, push Vice-President Joe Biden to the nomination and name Attorney General Loretta Lynch to the Supreme Court.
Coulter, during an interview with Chris Stigall on Talk Radio 1210 WPHT, said the process begins with charges emanating from the investigation into the former Secretary of State’s private email server.
“[James] Comey goes ahead, the FBI Director, because this egregious, indicts Hillary, but then this has to go to the Attorney General. Valerie Jarrett, who is very close to Obama, is chirping in his ear constantly, puts in a call to Lorretta Lynch, the Attorney General, and says disregard everything the President is about to say publicly. Obama comes out and says this is outrageous, Hillary did nothing wrong, there should be no indictment, but of course, the Attorney General is independent. Loretta Lynch goes ahead and indicts Hillary. It destroys Hillary’s campaign and gets Biden in and then it’s harder for the Republicans to say we refuse to put Loretta Lynch on the Supreme Court.”
(Excerpt) Read more at philadelphia.cbslocal.com ...
I agree with the poster at #15. I don’t think the GOP would confirm Lynch just because she did her job and prosecuted Clinton. I don’t think they’re that stupid.
” Bad things don’t happen to the Clintons.”
It’s long past time something does. Couldn’t happen to a more deserving Clinton than Hillary.....
It rings to me save the appointment. The Senate can’t convince any rational, informed American Lynch is fair minded. Her past can’t be white washed.
Biden will be able to “save the day” for the party. There are a lot of Dems that do not like Hillary. Biden could also run with Warren which shores up the hard left wing Dems.
I think trump would pull more to his side from biden’s expexted pool.
I think Hillary gets indicted if it looks like she cannot win the general election.
I hope not.
I hope not.
Coulter makes no sense here.
“How does that make it harder to for Republicans to refuse to put Lynch on SCOTUS?”
—
Because we would think she was just ducky for going after Hillary.
More proof that politics is a major league game.
.
She has neither the experience nor the temperament for the CoS.
Not sure I understand the article. Is the trade here, Lynch gets the SCOTUS nod in exchange for Hillary’s head? Will never happen. For one, it leaves Obama exposed should republicans tell him after Hillary’s indictment to go pound sand. What will Obama do? Announce they had a deal? For another thing, Hillary and friends wouldn’t leave the race regardless. The media would insist a cell be built in the oval office for her. And the people would love her for her courageousness.
The “Lynch indited Hillary” optic; it will make it hard for republicans to cast doubt on her judgement after that.
At least she admits Trump's a liar. The only question now is "Is he lying to the NYT, us, or both?"
Well, in my book - the jury is still out on whether the Senate is “stupid”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.