Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What is the largest number (this is not a trick question)

Posted on 03/04/2016 5:01:38 AM PST by LibWhacker

We all know that a billion is a lot and a trillion is a lot more, but what do you call numbers that are even bigger? A Googol is bigger: it's 10 to the hundredth power—but it's not the biggest. In this well-researched 19 minute film, master explainer Sharkee takes us through ever larger numbers.

He applies three rules. The largest number cannot be a number plus 1. The number must be useful in some way. And infinity doesn’t count, because it isn't actually a number.

VIDEO explaining how they arrive at these really big numbers (Googolplex is nothing) -- [19 minutes]


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: googol; largest; number; rayo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: rgboomers

That is right. But for the purposes of this game, we can’t do it. Did you watch the video? Worth it.

Another one of the rules that I don’t get is the idea that it must be a useful number. Okay... so he apparently thinks he can come up with a useful number that can’t be arrived at by adding 1 over and over again until we got there??? Sigh... Oh, well... rulz is rulz.


21 posted on 03/04/2016 5:53:27 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Well, Doc Brown said his wife was one in a googleplex, so HE thought it was an important number. :-)


22 posted on 03/04/2016 5:59:17 AM PST by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Oh, you've got to watch the video. The number of possible arrangements of a 9-sided (iirc) Rubik's cube is about 10193 (again, iirc). Also, check out the Googology Wiki. Cheers!
23 posted on 03/04/2016 5:59:45 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The largest number will be our debt if either of the dems get elected.


24 posted on 03/04/2016 6:03:20 AM PST by Big Mack (I love this country. It�s the government that scares the crap out of me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

One is the loneliest number.


25 posted on 03/04/2016 6:05:51 AM PST by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

infinity to the infinity power ...


26 posted on 03/04/2016 6:16:46 AM PST by bankwalker (In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Well without reading the Article and watching the film, the biggest number I had heard of before was the googolplex, or googol to the power of googol. To make that number bigger in a simple way, I would say googolplex! Or factorial googolplex. Which of course is googolplex * (googolplex-1) * (googolplex - 2)* .....* (googolplex -(googolplex-1)) = googolplex! I am sure there are much bigger though just from reading above, but this is more than I will ever need.


27 posted on 03/04/2016 6:18:24 AM PST by BRK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana; RandallFlagg
Right idea ... wrong spelling ...

I remember the word from around jr high school ....

28 posted on 03/04/2016 6:19:10 AM PST by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The term “infinity” comes to mind.


29 posted on 03/04/2016 6:38:05 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The largest number is the sum of all numbers, and that total is -1/12.

No, really, it is.

30 posted on 03/04/2016 7:08:16 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

31 posted on 03/04/2016 7:10:26 AM PST by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING ’VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rgboomers

Infinity to the infinite power X infinity to the infinite power + infinity.


32 posted on 03/04/2016 7:10:36 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Graham's number:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham's_number

33 posted on 03/04/2016 7:10:36 AM PST by papineau (Kaiser Sose for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

How many licks does it take to get to the Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop?

-PJ

34 posted on 03/04/2016 7:16:06 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
He applies three rules. The largest number cannot be a number plus 1.

Mathematicians are some of the most brilliant ... and illogical people on the planet.

35 posted on 03/04/2016 7:26:30 AM PST by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

That rule isn’t illogical. It’s a rule meant to make the game more interesting. Without it every new number is just a trivial “largest number,” that only remains the largest number until someone adds one to it.


36 posted on 03/04/2016 7:50:54 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: freedomlover

Lol, I’m trying to figure out a new game that identifies the loneliest number less than the largest number. But not one. Nor one plus any positive integer. Nor the largest number minus any positive integer. Hey, I think that’s it! That’s the new game... Go (starting with Rayo’s number).


37 posted on 03/04/2016 7:58:55 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Ha, not even if the Tootsie Pop is a googolplex times the size of the multiverse!

(Note: I haven't done the actual math to back up this assertion! But I'm pretty sure its true.)

38 posted on 03/04/2016 8:03:40 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker; GingisK; bgill

Gentlemen, gentlemen... You have broken the most important rule: We can’t use infinity!


39 posted on 03/04/2016 8:06:11 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: papineau

Thanks for that. Will read it later. Take a look at that video if you can. Graham’s number is mentioned. Turns out it’s a pipsqueak nowadays.


40 posted on 03/04/2016 8:09:39 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson