Posted on 02/29/2016 11:55:17 AM PST by pilgrim
The New Deal’s executor held many positions similar to those of to one Donald J. Trump. ________________________________________________
Imagine a U.S. president who is bombastic, egotistical, and just a little racist. He worries opening the borders will mean an influx of undesirables. He implements capricious executive orders, and seems more concerned with his own power than with the Constitution. He’s often called a fascist by people who know what the term means.
No, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Debate raged last December about whether President Trump would be a fascist. Steve Horwitz and Martin O’Malley, among others, claimed he would be. Not so fast, said Megan McArdle at Bloomberg View. A fascist president could never take power in America, McArdle argues, because, among other things, “America has neither the weak institutions nor the revolutionary organizations necessary for a Trump Reich to fester.”
But that’s not quite true. FDR may not have been Hitler or Mussolini. But the difference was one of degree, not of kind. And now Trump is following in his footsteps. Suspicious of Americans, Immigrants, and Refugees
FDR spied on political dissidents in the name of national security. In May 1940, he warned of a “fifth column” in America (a military term for civilian rebels), and claimed refugees might be enemy agents.
In “FDR Goes to War,” noted historians Burton and Anita Folsom tell the story of how FDR used the Internal Revenue Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and attorney general to go after his political enemies. He wiretapped phones, ordered tax audits of dissidents, and created a personal spy group to collect incriminating information about political rivals.
All of this was before FDR rounded up almost 122,000 Japanese-Americans and forced them into internment camps. While national security concerns were cited, FDR also considered Asians biologically untrustworthy.
FDR was also hostile towards refugees. When Jews sought to escape from Nazi Germany, FDR barred the gates. The State Department cut refugee immigration by 75 percent by imposing burdensome regulations. FDR defended his actions on the grounds that “among the refugees there are some spies….” But as with the internment camps, a darker motive also played in: FDR was an anti-Semite who waved away pleas to let in Jewish refugees as “Jewish wailing.”
This isn’t to suggest that all opposition to immigration is fascist. Many reasonable Americans favor immigration restrictions. But FDR’s immigration ideas, summed up in his claim that immigrants ought to have “blood of the right sort,” were clearly prejudicial. So is Trump’s rhetoric about Mexicans. The New Deal’s Not So Different from Fascism
Economically too, FDR’s ideology closely resembled the fascist policies of Mussolini’s Italy. With the creation of the National Recovery Association (NRA), FDR set up a system that pushed each industry into a cartel that cooperated with the federal government to set wages, prices, and “fair practices.” One NRA report even stated directly, “The Fascist Principles are very similar to those we have been evolving here in America.”
This similarity was not accidental. Rexford Tugwell, one of the architects of the New Deal, wrote that Mussolini had done “many of the things which seem to me necessary.”
Roosevelt said he was “deeply impressed by what [Mussolini] has accomplished.” Mussolini returned the favor in his review of FDR’s 1933 book “Looking Forward,” noting that, “Reminiscent of Fascism is (FDR’s) principle that the state no longer leaves the economy to its own devices.”
Like Trump, FDR had little respect for the separation of powers. When he tried to pass a 99.5 percent marginal tax rate on income above $100,000, Congress rebuffed him. So he issued an executive order mandating a 100 percent marginal tax rate, and lowered the ceiling to incomes of $25,000 per year (which Congress later rescinded). His attempt to do a similar end-run around the Supreme Court, the court-packing scheme, is infamous.
Paul Warburg, one of FDR’s first-term advisors, claimed, “I believe that Mr. Roosevelt is so charmed with the fun of brandishing the band leader’s baton at the head of the parade, so pleased with the picture he sees of himself, that he is no longer capable of recognizing that the human power to lead is limited.” FDR saw himself as a benevolent dictator, and his actions reflect that grandiosity. Trump has made a campaign of this same sort of grandiosity.
It’s true that FDR didn’t take total power in the United States, and that U.S. institutions prevented him from doing so. The Supreme Court struck down his ideas, especially before 1937. When he tried to pack the court with allies, the public rallied against him. Congress also refused to pass certain laws on his agenda. The Dictatorial Type Keeps Resurfacing
But FDR was both powerful and destructive. He was not Mussolini, but he ran roughshod over the rule of law, and dramatically transformed American politics—which should serve as an example of what a Trump presidency might look like.
In fact, a Trump presidency could be even more dangerous, because the powers of the presidency have expanded. The White House can place citizens on terrorist watch lists—spying on them and preventing them from flying. The president can order U.S. citizens who are abroad, like Anwar Al-Awlaki, to be assassinated without a trial. The National Security Agency allows the president to spy on political dissidents such as Faisal Gill (a Muslim Republican) and Nihad Awab (director of a Muslim civil rights organization), or even to wiretap news outlets like the Associated Press.
This doesn’t mean a Trump presidency would lead to brown shirts on the street. But there is more to fascism than goose-stepping and military style uniforms, and Trump, like FDR, displays many such characteristics. So when people look at Trump’s agenda and claim “it can’t happen here,” they’re ignoring history that’s not even a century old. Not only could such things happen, they already have.
The only sure way to guard against Trump is to roll back the enormous power of the government that he would be managing. History, even in the United States, shows that dangerous men dupe voters and take power. We should shrink government so that when they’re elected, they take as little power as possible.
Julian Adorney is a Young Voices Advocate. He has written for FEE, Townhall, The Hill, and Lawrence Read’s latest book “Excuse Me, Professor.”
Thanks.
Really think parts of his opinion would be closer to some of the things our current pResident’s actions. He may see that.
Think he wants all undesirables here!!! Someone mentioned he may be using a retirement ‘cabin’ elsewhere. Hope.......better stop there.
Thanks again!!
I agree with that Don-O, and when our nation is secure again that will become my number one issue.
You see, I value the life of the living as well.
I also, find it juvenile.
Hope you can survive the offense.
I think you can!
Take care.........pilgrim
And DT is not young. He has consistently been inconsistent except in how he operates. Loves his lawyers to circumvent and intimidate. Imagine the DOJ and FBI under his control.
LOL!! Sometime use verbs as nouns and nouns as verbs. Have been called for dangling participles!! Major offense!!!
In a way glad they never were cognizant of it!! It would really have hurt them.
Take care.........pilgrim
There are definitely sticking resemblances in certain areas.
Hi,
Do not personally have knowledge of third paragraph but good to know someone does.
I do not agree with the all the author’s opinion there are some similarities. imo.
Thanks for that well thought out analytical, significant, factual replu, it contributes to the discussion!
Take care.........pilgrim
These are the demographics of DT supporters.
“In September David Brady and Douglas Rivers of the Hoover Institution took a closer look at the demographics of Mr Trump’s enduring coalition. They painted a picture of Trump supporters as largely older, less wealthy and less educated.
They found that more than half of Trump-backers are female. About a third are over the age of 65. Only 2% are younger than 30. Half of his voters have a high-school diploma, but just 19% have a college degree. Just over a third earn less than $50,000, while 11% make six figures or more.”
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35047233
Because of the loss of news articles I spend more time finding about what is going on outside of the election in other places.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/
http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/
http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews
http://benghazi.house.gov/
http://www.breitbart.com/
Glance at yahoo news and drudge. Listen to Rush and Levin but not every day. Go to their sites to occasionally. But I will not abandon Jim R.
Need to bookmark to remember when things slow down!! LOL!
Thanks for the info!!!
Agree!
Not all the article is pertinent but some points are concerning.
Thanks!
That is a consistent characteristic.
Time back, past actions could be used to predict certain future actions as a norm, but seems no longer to be considered.
If elected, certainly HOPE he surprises me. I will vote for him over the dem candidate...........but have no delusions.
Expect the unexpected............
After the last 7 years and acknowledging the reality that our nation has indeed fallen, and after reading the Bible in depth, nothing will surprise me.
There is nothing new under the sun.
Things have been deteriorating at a rapid pace!!!
May be rough time ahead, but we know how it ends!!!
Book of Revelation 22:20 “Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!”
We know how it starts! A new era. Maranatha!
To:
Jewbacca;BenLurkin;CTrent1564;zipper;Blood of Tyrants;don-o;Theophilus;discostu;St_Thomas_Aquinas;goodwithagun;NorthMountain;DoughtyOne;Captain Peter Blood;Jay Thomas;huldah1776;DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis;
I personally wish to thank you for those great well voiced, sensible responses!!
Dialogue is REALLY APPRECIATED!!!(cfeo) Thanks!
In life and politics there are no guarantees. The closest we have to a guarantee in 2016 is that a vote for Jeb would be a vote for more of the same...and that if things don't change fast there's no going back.
The primary season has shown the degree to which the GOPee has rigged the system, will fight change, fight giving up control. All the change we've fought for in 2010 and 2014 has been for naught. Under the current circumstances congressional elections are meaningless.
I'll repeat that. Under the current circumstances, congressional elections are meaningless. Strategy and effort and donations are for naught. Come the next amnesty, the ruling class will have accomplished turning America into a First World country with a Third World electorate. Since the two can't co-exist, it's obvious which will give way...and the noble experiment will have ended.
If we're to stem the tide we must focus on essentials. Take out the GOPee, defeat PC, stop the flow of illegals and terrorists, stop apologizing for being America. Without that, we have no constitution and no country.
So, that's where we are. Rubio is a boy, easily controlled by the establishment; amnesty and open borders are a given. Cruz is a constitutional conservative but the Blob will bury him. As President he will be little more than a bystander; well meaning but a bystander nonetheless.
I shake my head at those who worry about "damaging the brand," because the hour is much later than they grasp. I see where Cruz doesn't have the juice and Rubio is a pretty boy; with Trump I acknowledge the danger but think, "Hey, this could work." I don't think Trump will be a Banana Republic dictator.
That's why I regard the hand wringing about 'constitutional conservatives' as perhaps well meaning but largely irrelevant. That's fighting the last battle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.