Posted on 02/28/2016 3:32:56 PM PST by ShadowAce
Border. Border. Border.
Any questions?
Best endorsement ever - Jeff Sessions puts on a Make America Great Again hat!
30,000 there and 26,300 on the live stream;
LIVE Stream: Donald Trump Rally in Madison, AL (2-28-16)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKWRtkfyOiw
Trump said he wants to be able to sue those who LIE about him. That’s not a violation of the “freedom of press.” That’s simply good laws and not offering a protected status to those who lie. Quit mis-representing Trump’s stances Matt Walsh. It’s simply not working.
Whaaa! Why will Trump not sit still and let us hit him! Whaa!
Utterly idiotic potion to try and argue Matt.
My pleasure. I've heard my father say the same thing 10 times in 48 hours. Media keeps wanting a different answer. https://t.co/dNsuqveQys— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) February 28, 2016
@DonaldJTrumpJr Thanks for having Guts to publicly reject KKK & White Supremacist Support! Now what about @realDonaldTrump Rejecting Them??— san (@sanosbo1) February 28, 2016
Mussolini was a national socialist, and therefore has more in common with bern sanders and hillary clinton.
I am not impressed by gotcha’s
Also, Trump asked for clarification on these groups he is supposed to disavow. I will therefore conclude he does not run with that crowd and does not know of their beliefs.
If we don’t stop the immigration - both legal and illegal, we won’t have a Country.
Presidents have no bearing over a civil case such as libel.
Anyone who take Trump at his word on any of the crap that comes out of his mouth should be examined. He does it for attention. He does it to throw red meat to the people who support him.
He is not my candidate, but they all are blowhards about the “stuff” they are going to do. Just read their tax plans. None of them have any chance of happening.
Yes. I'm for building a wall (and a minefield) as well as the deportation of all illegals (with a permanent ban on return).
Note that if the IRS contends you owe them more than $50,000, your passport can already be confiscated under new law. And as we've seen, the IRS can and will be politicized to attack citizens as "enemies."
Question: If a POTUS decides to implement his will with pen and phone to build a wall while bypassing Congress, why shouldn't we expect DHS under such a man to also use the wall to prevent citizens from leaving the country too?
About to make America Great Again....as never before.
I agree! Let’s all unite behind Jeb! /s
He didn’t say anything about negative stories.
He was talking about outright lies.
Another stretch of the truth.
Trump said today on the Chris Wallace show that what he wanted to punish was/is news media who print what they know to be a lie and when confronted with the facts, refused to make a correction or retraction.
I don’t think that unreasonable.
A news paper would still be able to call you stupid, incapable, a nutcase lib, etc., but could not call you a crook without researching it first.
And I suspect that Congress will have something to say on the subject.
Actually I disagree to some extent because total freedom of speech and the press quickly displays all of the fools.
But then I have never been accused of being a member of the mob or a con man. I might have a less generous attitude if I had.
“... so he is clearly vowing to outlaw all criticism of government.”
Stopped reading right there.
Is that what all of you Trumpsters really want?
And also know how to dress like Adults!
See reply #14
His alternating skills of charming some individuals and riding roughshod over others has earned Donald Trump a reputation in some quarters as someone not to be trusted. He reneged, for example, on a promise to donate to a museum the Art Deco bas- reliefs on the facade of Bonwit Tellers - bulldozed to make way for Trump Tower. It was a sin deemed unforgivable by landmark preservationists. But the only negative comments about Donald Trump these days are given off the record.
http://www.nytimes.com/1983/08/07/business/the-empire-and-ego-of-donald-trump.html?pagewanted=all
why? might have something to do with lawyers...and y'all want him to have the Dept of Injustice, FBI, and NSA at his whim? Go for it. I bet the FBI which is chomping at the bit to hit hillary is dreading him being elected. If he is, I pray Cruz goes ballistic in the senate.
Now the old libel law used to be (that) youre responsible, you say something false that harms somebodys reputation, we dont care if it was told to you by nine bishops, you are liable, Scalia continued. New York Times v. Sullivan just cast that aside because the Court thought in modern society, itd be a good idea if the press could say a lot of stuff about public figures without having to worry. And that may be correct, that may be right, but if it was right it should have been adopted by the people. It should have been debated in the New York Legislature and the New York Legislature could have said, Yes, were going to change our libel law. But the living constitutionalists on the Supreme Court, the Warren Court, simply decided, Yes, it used to be that
George Washington could sue somebody that libeled him, but we dont think thats a good idea any more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.