Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two Candidates NOT Born in the US Received Electoral Votes in 1796 Presidential Election [vanity]
me ^ | 21 Feb 2016 | me

Posted on 02/21/2016 12:18:51 AM PST by matt1234

To shed light on the Cruz birther issue, I researched the question: "Has a candidate NOT born in the US ever received electoral votes in a presidential election?" The answer is "yes." In the 1796 election, James Iredell, born in England, and Samuel Johnston, born in Scotland, both received electoral votes. I did not find evidence that these votes were invalidated by Congress, which they can do and have done; but I did not research that extensively. Links with evidence at post #1?


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: 1796election; 2016election; birther; canada; concerntroll; concerntrolls; cruz; cuba; election1796; election2016; electoralcollege; electoralvotes; jamesiredell; luzer; luzers; samueljohnston; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
Wiki page about 1796 election with EV breakdown: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1796

Wiki page about James Iredell: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Iredell

Wiki page about Samuel Johnston: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Johnston

1 posted on 02/21/2016 12:18:51 AM PST by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Here is the key, when the Constitution was written, it said that anyone that was here when the Constitution was written is eligible. Basically if you busted your butt to help us win the war, you can be President.

I don’t have the exact wording, but that is the gist of it. I’m tired, but wanted to reply before I went to sleep.


2 posted on 02/21/2016 12:36:56 AM PST by mrsadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Ping


3 posted on 02/21/2016 12:37:13 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Vote Tom Hoefling of America's Party for President the only person to restore the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Thanks for your research.


4 posted on 02/21/2016 12:43:29 AM PST by LowOiL (Woe to you when all men speak well of you, for that is how their fathers treated the false prophets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Both “citizens at the time of adoption”

You haven’t helped Cruz.


5 posted on 02/21/2016 12:49:01 AM PST by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsadams; matt1234

The exact wording says that anyone who was a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, was eligible to be President.

People should READ the Constitution before starting threads about the Constitution.


6 posted on 02/21/2016 1:01:24 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

A few years ago when researching Sen.Obama, I came across a footnote that piqued my interest: it stated that the U.S.Senate had the power to eject from their body any Senator who was deemed ineligible. It mentioned that during the 19th century two Senators, neither of whom were U.S. citizens, experienced just that. Their names were struck from the records as never having existed.

One of the gentlemen involved became a U.S. citizen, waited for the required number of years and was again chosen by his state to be a Senator in Congress.

Senator Cruz should do something to repair his U.S. citizenship, or he just might find himself without any country at all and Texas may not have a say in it.


7 posted on 02/21/2016 1:07:31 AM PST by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE USA OF TWO USA CITIZENS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

In 1796, no one who was old enough to be president had been born in the US, because the US didn’t exist at the time of their birth.


8 posted on 02/21/2016 1:21:35 AM PST by Hepsabeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

You might consider researching the Constitution of the United States one of these days.


9 posted on 02/21/2016 1:40:21 AM PST by Radix (Natural Born Citizens have Citizen parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

If they resided here at time of Constitution ratification they became citizens like anyone else at that time....who qualified


10 posted on 02/21/2016 1:42:39 AM PST by wardaddy (Boy the nasties are sure out in force here.....I hope someone is saving this...Trump Cruz that order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Thank you for your inestimable advice.

This topic is broader than the constitution. For example, some on FR have claimed that the founders would never have considered someone born outside the US (or former colonies) as eligible for president. Clearly, early Americans, if not the founders themselves, did consider such persons eligible.

11 posted on 02/21/2016 1:46:48 AM PST by matt1234 (Note to GOPe lurkers: I and thousands like me will NEVER vote for Jeb Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mrsadams

None of the candidates in 1796 were born in the United States.


12 posted on 02/21/2016 1:53:16 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sonoIt is always better to stay away from the Gainesville area feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hepsabeth

I did not consider candidates born in the American colonies or American territories as “born outside the US.”


13 posted on 02/21/2016 1:54:05 AM PST by matt1234 (Note to GOPe lurkers: I and thousands like me will NEVER vote for Jeb Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan; matt1234
People should READ the Constitution before starting threads about the Constitution.

Exactly.

14 posted on 02/21/2016 1:55:25 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Radix

See post #11.


15 posted on 02/21/2016 1:56:15 AM PST by matt1234 (Note to GOPe lurkers: I and thousands like me will NEVER vote for Jeb Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
Correct.

I did not consider candidates born in the American colonies or American territories as “born outside the US.” I looked for candidates born outside US territorial limits or American colonies.

16 posted on 02/21/2016 2:01:48 AM PST by matt1234 (Note to GOPe lurkers: I and thousands like me will NEVER vote for Jeb Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

The person elected President that year (John Adams) wasn’t born in the US either.

But if you actually read the Constiution you would see that it allowed for that to happen.


17 posted on 02/21/2016 2:31:15 AM PST by sipow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Before the advent of Barak Obama, the accepted wisdom was that natural born meant born within the borders of the United States of a citizen father(before about 1970) or more recently, of a citizen parent. Because of tacit recognition that Hussein did not fit the category The Congress passed a resolution that McCain was natural born, primarily to clear Hussein, to get the whole question off the table. Where a candidate was born is probably no longer an issue that could actually hinder a candidate. Citizenship at birth or even current with a campaign is probably fading as a hindrance to being President as the Constitution is less and less relevant.


18 posted on 02/21/2016 2:34:58 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sonoIt is always better to stay away from the Gainesville area feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Nobody who ran before 1824 could have been born a citizen of the United States.


19 posted on 02/21/2016 3:06:59 AM PST by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man St anding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL

Faulty research that forgot to read the Constitution.


20 posted on 02/21/2016 3:13:57 AM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson