Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/17/2016 9:04:36 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: TigerClaws
Has too many muzzies in his employ .... foolish, foolish man ....

Can you spell Trojan Horse NOW ??

2 posted on 02/17/2016 9:06:36 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

What is Apple worried about? That the government will keep the encryption key?

This looks bad for Apple all the way around.


3 posted on 02/17/2016 9:08:27 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws; Swordmaker; pgyanke
Apple acknowledged that it could extract such data if it wanted to.

Whoa. If this is the same type of phone, this puts an entirely new spin on it, doesn't it? :)

4 posted on 02/17/2016 9:09:55 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Trump said tonight Apple is in the wrong....and should comply


5 posted on 02/17/2016 9:13:06 PM PST by Guenevere (If.the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

I’m no computer tech/software developer, but can’t they write another encryption program and update every iPhone but that one?

If they’ve already done this before, there’s no good reason for them to not get the FBI into the murderers’ phones now.


7 posted on 02/17/2016 9:14:52 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

So NOW the government is so concerned with fighting terrorism. Where the f were they when they allowed the terrorists into the country in the first place?


9 posted on 02/17/2016 9:16:30 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Yes but Apple wasnt run by a faggot back then.


12 posted on 02/17/2016 9:17:33 PM PST by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
This is getting confusing. I thought the problem was that Apple itself is currently not able to harvest the data from this i-phone, and that the court ordered them to build a device that would be able to harvest it.

Do I have that correct?

18 posted on 02/17/2016 9:21:14 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Apple could just make a “corporate edition” OS with a backdoor.

I predict this will be the solution. Private phones won’t have it.

Incrementalism, I believe it’s called.


28 posted on 02/17/2016 9:33:11 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

I have a feeling that if it were the other way around, that this was a case of people murdering a bunch of Muslims, or it it were anti-homosexual murders, that Cook would have no objection.


32 posted on 02/17/2016 9:38:01 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
Well that's it then, Apple won't cooperate. I guess the investigation is over, there's no way to catch any more terrorists. Without access to the contents of this iphone there is simply no way to find out anything about this crime. /s

I find it odd that we have judges that feel the courts have the power to order Apple to CREATE a backdoor to get into someone elses property but would never consider an order to search and monitor the mosques where all these subhumans foment their evil.

46 posted on 02/17/2016 9:54:39 PM PST by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

bookmark


47 posted on 02/17/2016 9:59:30 PM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Wow. This is HUGE. Apple defending terrorists.


48 posted on 02/17/2016 10:01:08 PM PST by McGruff (Flexibility is a good thing, but you should not be flexible on core principles - Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
IF Apple were to have to do this, who would pay for it?

If ti takes an army of 1000 programmers working for several years to do this, that is going to be expensive. Plus, taking this people away from their usual jobs is going to hurt Apple.

Maybe the issue is that enough money has not yet been offered...

51 posted on 02/17/2016 10:11:46 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; Airwinger; ...
Apple Unlocked iPhones for the Feds 70 Times Before. . . since 2008. Of course, these were earlier model iPhones and the cases were different, and Apple did have the means to do what was asked when these earlier cases were presented. They were also cases where an active prosecution was pending, not a fishing expedition over a dead Terrorist's iPhone where the case is essentially dead. -- PING!


Apple Security and Privacy
Ping!

The latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword "ApplePingList" on FreeRepublic's Search.

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me

57 posted on 02/18/2016 12:19:47 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Very interesting. It seems the only reason Apple will not unlock this phone is it hurts their profits. Due to their current big selling point of their products having no backdoor for the Federales. BUT WAIT! Now it seems they do indeed have backdoors (or other unlocks) that only Apple can open and has opened in the past for law enforcement. Apple is far from helpless and has been lying about being unable to get past its own encryption. I am shocked that such an effete gang of California homos would be lying. Shocked!


73 posted on 02/18/2016 1:20:36 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Sure seems this current case will wind through the courts with Apple being ordered to unlock the phone


74 posted on 02/18/2016 1:22:09 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Simple solution: dig up the corpse and use Touch ID. :P


80 posted on 02/18/2016 2:05:49 AM PST by Read Write Repeat (Battleborn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

I don’t see a problem here. If the password is a series of numbers in sequence to unlock the screen, then why aren’t they looking at finger-prints or wear patterns ( even at a micron level ) to ascertain what the combo might be. Then compare what the numbers are to numbers in these two despots lives like birthdays, or something that might have significance. No I don’t work for the Rand Corp., but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night...


81 posted on 02/18/2016 2:14:30 AM PST by taildragger (Not my Monkey, not my Circus...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Just hilarious. Next, maybe Cook will start acting like he can’t hear...


83 posted on 02/18/2016 2:28:23 AM PST by StAnDeliver ("Sweet, sweet tears ..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson