Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

We'll know anytime now. Remember, with Zero it's ALL POLITICS, ALL THE TIME. His choice will be POLITICAL just as Lynch is POLITICAL and she would NEVER be able to interpret the Constitution and apply the law WITHOUT BIAS.
1 posted on 02/16/2016 1:40:25 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: CivilWarBrewing
Oh yeah, and the Lynch pick is a TWO-FER: Race & Gender
2 posted on 02/16/2016 1:42:28 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

If the Republicans do not block this then America is finished. And it will be time for a new party and disband the Republican crap.


3 posted on 02/16/2016 1:43:07 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Is she a lesbian? How could the senate turn down the first black lesbian appointment to the Supreme Court. What else matters? /s


4 posted on 02/16/2016 1:43:31 PM PST by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

“If the Republican Congress or presidential candidates resist this choice, the President is giving Hillary fodder for rallying the black vote and bashing the Republicans as ‘THE RACIST PARTY’ and this would be a continuous media feeding frenzy throughout the election!”

So.........what would be different?


5 posted on 02/16/2016 1:43:32 PM PST by jessduntno (The mind of a liberal...deceit, desire for control, greed, contradiction and fueled by hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Just ask Dr. Ben Carson for a full-throated public explanation as to why Lynch is utterly unacceptable. But really, all this discussion wouldn’t be happening if anybody, anywhere, could put any trust in McConnell and the GOPe. In fact, the reason we’re having this “what-if” guessing game is precisely because everyone knows how utterly squishy McConnell and the GOPe are.


6 posted on 02/16/2016 1:44:42 PM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

It doesn’t matter what liberal he nominates.

They only get one vote like the rest of them, and they will all vote with the liberal 4 to remove the last of our freedoms and must be stopped at all costs.


7 posted on 02/16/2016 1:44:54 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

If Obama wants to get someone approved, it’ll be someone moderate enough to win over the backstabbers...Mukowski, Ayotte, Flake, Lindsey Graham. You know they and a few other will cross lines with the slightest excuse.


10 posted on 02/16/2016 1:46:09 PM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing
I would LOVE to see the press corpse ask 0dunga the following question!:

What if Congress took as long on choosing Scalia's replacement as you did to make a decision on the XL Keystone Pipeline which took 7 years?

11 posted on 02/16/2016 1:46:57 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Well....the GOP approved her once before. The fold is imminent.


14 posted on 02/16/2016 1:50:01 PM PST by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

He will nominate someone, anyone, other than the qualified white guy.


15 posted on 02/16/2016 1:51:03 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Her successor as AG will have to agree not to indict HRC, that may complicate things.


17 posted on 02/16/2016 1:52:18 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing


MY prediction:
Corey Booker.

18 posted on 02/16/2016 1:52:27 PM PST by onyx (YOU'RE POSTING HERE, HOPE YOU'RE A DONOR! FReepLoaders are RUDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Why nominate? Recess appoint her now.


19 posted on 02/16/2016 1:52:44 PM PST by BushCountry (Studies show that one out of three Liberals are as stupid as the other two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Nope, she’s too much of an insider. People will think poorly of it thus ruining his strategy.


20 posted on 02/16/2016 1:53:20 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

He just cited the ‘Constitution’. How come he never does that when he does unconstitutional things like changing immigration laws without Congressional consent?


23 posted on 02/16/2016 2:00:22 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Wouldn’t be surprised. She would be used for maximum political effect. Otherwise, she is too old. Bathhouse Barry would prefer someone younger to destroy America for the coming decades.


25 posted on 02/16/2016 2:03:10 PM PST by subterfuge (TED CRUZ FOR POTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Is she gay? I don’t think two victim classes, black and a woman, qualifies for any new Obama appointments.


26 posted on 02/16/2016 2:03:33 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Yep. And if republicans don’t confirm her, they’re racists.


27 posted on 02/16/2016 2:05:45 PM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Wouldn’t surprise me a bit. Or “Stedman” Holder, but I think even Obama may realize he’s not going to ram that one through. What he needs is someone who will end up with the liberals on the court but who has a veneer of objectivity that the Senate will look bad rejecting.

One thing for sure, there’s no way Obama lets this crisis go to waste. Because “he won”.


28 posted on 02/16/2016 2:08:47 PM PST by bigbob ("Victorious warriors win first and then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CivilWarBrewing; All

I am sooooo happy that this is an election year. The ill-conceived 17th Amendment will arguably backfire on the anti-constitutional republic Progressive Movement with respect to angry patriots exercising their voting muscle to fire state sovereignty-ignoring senators.

Note that a Senate controlled by a 2/3 conservative supermajority can then work with the House to impeach and remove state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices from the bench.


29 posted on 02/16/2016 2:09:27 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson